#2************************************** AANEWS
******************************* 4/7/96
******************************************************************************
********************
AANEWS is distributed by AMERICAN ATHEISTS, a nationwide movement founded by
Madalyn Murray O'Hair for the advancement of Atheism, and the total, absolute
separation of government and religion. For information on this list, send
mail to: aanews-request@listserv.atheists.org, and put "info aanews" in the
body of your message. You can receive information about our organization by
sending e-mail to: info@atheists.org; be sure to include your name, mailing
address and zip code.
Reply-To: aanews@listserv.atheists.org, Cgastbook@aol.com
####################
AFGHAN REBEL OFFENSIVE -- A BRAVE, NEW ISLAMIC WORLD
The "Frankenstein" Principle is becoming a reality in Afghanistan.
For several decades, standard U.S. foreign policy consisted of support for
nearly any political or military movements which were opposed to "godless
communism", and conflicted with the foreign policy agendas of the Soviet
Union, China, or other Marxist states. The result was that Uncle Sam found
himself with "strange bedfellows" -- from Latin American death squads to drug
lord in the Golden Triangle. When Islamic insurgents began their battle with
the Soviet-style government in Afghanistan nearly a decade ago, the U.S.
through its lot in with a host of motley religious thugs and self-proclaimed
"freedom fighters."
The Soviets had their own debacle in Afghanistan, though, which
contributed to the decline of the communist state and its eventual
replacement with the unstable Russian Federation. The Kabul government
survives, however, besieged by a number of rebel groups including the
notorious Mujahi
deen. And Afghanistan has become the latest example of how foreign policy
can create a "Frankenstein", a situation out of control and running amuk.
Washington may well regret its earlier support for Islamic activists and its
"anything but the commies" approach to internal diplomacy.
The latest chapter in this story of how Afghans inherited a brutal
political situation involves the group known as Taliban. The word is derived
from an Urdu-persian term meaning student, which describes the origins of the
well-armed militia group now controlling a good chunk of the Afghan
countryside. The Taliban operate out of Pakistan; many recent recuits are
illiterate and members of Afghanistan's largest tribal group, the Sunni
Muslim Pashtuns, which also populate other countries in the region.
Laying siege to the Afghan capital of Kabul, the Taliban is quickly
created a thug-theocracy which goes far beyond even the repressive climat in
fundamentalist Iran. Taliban guards set up check points and confiscate
books, magazines, papers and even cassette tapes. When the group seizes
control of a village, they immediately shut down schools, especially those
for girls and women; TV sets are banned, and Taliban patrols tear down
antennas. A Taliban militiaman told CNN News recently that "the Koran
forbids music and television." Women are quickly ordered to wear the
notorious head covering, the veil, and must be accompanied by males in public
-- a situation reminiscent of Arab theocracies like Saudi Arabia.
Despite its fundamentalist agenda, though, the Taliban frightens even some
of the mullahs and theocrats in Iran; Taliban support also reflects the
complex political arrangements throughout the sub-continent. Although they
are muslim, the Taliban is also anti-Shiite. Iran's Shia leadership thus
supports the Kabul government, along with Russia, India and Tajikistan. All
these countries are providing whatever support they can for Afghan President
Burhanuddin Rabbani.
But Pakistan, Uzbekistan and other Arab Gulf states have begun supporting
the Taliban for their own geo-political regions. Pakistan has had a
long-standing policy of seeking development of "the Islamic bomb", a
thermo-nuclear capability; there is evidence that India wants the same
military muscle, of course.
The Far East Economic Review analyzed the Taliban insurgency in its Feb.
1, 1996 issue, and quoted diplomatic sources as warning that "The Afghan
conflict has become internationalized as never before," warning that tensions
have increased with Russian and Iranian involvement. Iran has established
training camps for an estimated 8,000 guerillas led by a former Taliban
officer, Ismael Khan. And while Iran nominally supports the present Afghan
regime, Khan seems to be its best candidate in the event both the Taliban,
and the Kabul government, can be vanquished.
There is also the bizarre confluence of Iranian and Russian foreign
policy. Iran fears the Taliban for its anti-shiite bias; and the Taliban is
even MORE FUNDAMENTALIST than the Iranian clerics. Russia also has a stake
in the situation, even with the decomposition of the former Soviet Union;
within the borders of present-day Russia, Muslims are the fastest growing
ethnic group. Preventing the spread of any Islamic fundamentalism may be in
the best interest in Moscow.
Ironically, the Mujahadin, which received Stinger missiles and other
equipment from the U.S. in its war against Kabul, now is reportedly receiving
Stingers from Iran. Last year, the Afghan government sold the Tehran regime
$1,000,000 worth of these weapons. Despite efforts by American intelligence,
Stingers are now once again flowing into the hands of the Mujahideen.
Meanwhile, the fanatical Taliban are receiving arms and funds from Pakistan,
including a new communications system, and support from Bahrain, Qatar and
Saudi Arabia.
With the winter snow beginning to melt, everyone seems to be gearing up
for heavy, new offensives. In the fighting for political and social power,
varying degrees of religious fundamentalism are all that the Afghan
population can look forward to. The goal of an Islamic Republic has not yet
been abandoned by the clerics in Iran, of course; but the Taliban phenomena
suggests that creating "one nation under Allah" is something which can
easilly be carried well beyond extremes.
*****************************
(Editor's note: Ironically, the use of the term "Frankenstein" in this
article was included BEFORE we noticed the URL for an internet reference you
can check out: visit http://frankenstein.worldweb.net/afghan for more.)
***
EVEN MISSING, MADALYN O'HAIR STILL A CONCERN TO FUNDIES
Nobody seems to know what happened to the Murray O'Hair family. Since
they left the American Atheists headquarters over six months ago, there has
been no definitive word from the three individuals who played an important
role in the American Atheist movement, and the fight for separation of
government and religion. They vanished without a trace, and without leaving
much word of where they were going and when they would return.
That hasn't stopped speculation by the newsmedia, religionists and
disgruntled individuals, though. And you can bet that today, Easter Sunday
-- a "day of heat" for religious believers -- Madalyn Murray O'Hair will be
the object of a lot of attention.
Easter Sunday is one of those days when religious groups throughout the
country like to circulate word about the notorious but bogus "FCC Petition"
which O'Hair SUPPOSEDLY has filed with the Federal Communications Commission.
The Petition is a hoax, of course; when she was around, Madalyn O'Hair never
did file any such document, and the phantom petition has now become a virtual
folk-legend in American culture.
Early last month, for instance the parish newsletter of St. Clement's
Catholic Church in Dearborn, Michigan was stuffed with an urgent warning
telling the faithful that "We need 1 million signed letters" right away sent
to the FCC in Washington. Why? Supposedly, Madalyn O'Hair -- the woman who
did so much to end mandatory prayer and Bible recitation in the public
schools -- was out to ban religious broadcasting on the nation's airwaves.
In the demonology of christian religious fundamentalism, O'Hair -- conniving
with bureaucrats, atheists and devil-worshippers in Washington -- was going
to prohibit any religious message on radio, maybe on TV. Goodbye, Billy
Graham, Morris Cerillo and Pat Robertson.
Trouble is, it isn't true. What O'Hair DID DO was establish the nation's
first atheist radio program, the American Atheist Radio Series; she followed
that up with a cable TV show which once reached 130 cable systems, and is now
being re-started. But there was NOTHING -- repeat NOTHING -- about banning
religious broadcasting. O'Hair, a civil libertarian, simply wanted "equal
time" for Atheists.
That hasn't stopped the phantom petition, though. Spike Tyson, the office
manager for American Atheists, told the DETROIT NEWS recently that the FCC
rumor began a couple of years ago by "two guys almost as a joke...It just
keeps growing and growing." Indeed, it does. For more than 20 years,
churchgoers have been inundating the FCC with frantic letters, telegrams,
faxes, and petitions of their owned, protesting Madalyn O'Hair. The NEWS
quoted Audrey Spivak, a representative for the FCC who said "We (the agency)
stopped counting when they reached 25 million, and that was in 1994."
Reportedly, "church intensive" holydays like Easter bring out a new flock
of believers with new anxieties and in quest of new demons. Madalyn O'Hair,
present or missing in person, is always there as a target. We suspect that
on Monday, mailboxes will be stuffed with letters from frightened
parishioners and congregants worried that "the most hated woman in America"
is about to throw Pope John Paul or the neighborhood faith-healer out of the
TV studio. And by about Wednesday, an army of clerks at the FCC -- paid well
by the U.S. taxpayers -- will be sorting through dozens, hundreds, even
thousands of such missives. They'll be tearing down good pay (plus pension
and retirement benefits) for their efforts; and they'll probably be competing
with each other to see who can land the most "FCC hoax letters" into the
circular file.
We hope Madalyn O'Hair isn't dead, that instead she is alive, well, and
kicking back after 35 years of work for Atheism and the First Amendment. If
you're out there reading about this, Madalyn, we hope that the FCC Hoax
brings a smile to your face!
******************
AND JUST HOSTILE IS THE CULTURE TO ''PEOPLE OF FAITH''?
Groups like the Christian Coalition frequently complain that government
and society are "hostile to people of faith." Is this true? Is there any
evidence for such a contention?
Ralph Reed, the CC Director, often equates "hostility" with any policy
reflecting government neutrality toward religion in keeping with the First
Amendment. For Reed and others, when government is not "pro-active" in
fostering religion, it is automatically "hostile."
But there are statistical indications that far from being a group "under
attack" by atheists and secularists in government, religious superstition is
actually a thriving marketplace. One indication of this is the thriving
industry of religious broadcasting, specifically, christian radio stations.
The National Religious Broadcasters group, a trade association based in
Virginia, reported that last year the number of radio outlets carrying
religious programming 15 hours or more each week rose 10% to 1,463. There is
also the success of firms like Salem Communications Corporation, which has 35
stations nationwide and uses religious programming to encourage "traditional
family values."
Research by AANEWS shows that religious broadcasters are aggressively
targetting "niche demographics", specifically groups like blacks, hispanics
and women. Like their television counterparts, their formats often mimic
mainstream media -- there are call-in shows (often with christian "family
counsellors"), and even pop music by religious groups which only recently
have spilled over into the mainstream marketplace. One religious broadcaster
recently told the NEW YORK TIMES that his company was taking a "positive
approach", and recruiting advertising from firms which fit the needs of his
religious conservative audience.
Who does advertise on these stations? Churches promote their activities,
of course, but increasingly there are car dealers, cleaning firms, banks and
real-estate brokerages. The giant ServiceMaster firm, a nationwide
janitorial service, has an explicitly religious theme to its marketting
strategy; and the real estate business is populated by religious
fundamentalists who combine their talents in the marketplace with a
"prosperity gospel" philosophy.
According to Gary Crossland of the Soma Research demographic firm in
Dallas, Texas, "Christian radio has the greatest concentration of women of
all radio formats." (NYT, 2/12/96)
While such statistics tend to undermine the alarmist views of Ralph Reed,
they do suggest that religious conservatism is growing in both its appeal and
in the sophistication of how it is marketed.There is an even more disturbing
side to this, however; in the quest for "christian programming", some
religious stations have aired extreme, fundamentalist messages from groups
such as the Christian Identity movement. There is also a not-so-subtle
anti-feminist, anti-gay and anti-tolerance message which is constantly
re-inforced by religious talk show hosts, advice-peddlers and commentators.
****************
You may quote from or forward AANEWS, provided that credit is given to this
service and American Atheists. For more information about this information
and commentary letter, send e-mail to: aanews-request@listserv.atheists.org,
and put "info aanews'' in the body.
***********************************************************************
* *
* American Atheists website: http://www.atheists.org *
* PO Box 140195 FTP: ftp://ftp.atheists.org *
* Austin, TX 78714-0195 *
* Voice: (512) 458-1244 Dial-THE-ATHEIST: *
* FAX: (512) 467-9525 (512) 458-5731 *
* *
* Atheist Viewpoint TV: avtv@atheists.org *
* Info on American Atheists: info@atheists.org, *
* & American Atheist Press include your name and mailing address *
* AANEWS -Free subscription: aanews-request@listserv.atheists.org *
* and put "info aanews" in message body *
* *
* This text may be freely downloaded, reprinted, and/other *
* otherwise redistributed, provided appropriate point of *
* origin credit is given to American Atheists. *
* *
***********************************************************************
Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the
author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and
opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The
opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.