SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Syllabus
BOARD OF EDUCATION OF KIRYAS JOEL VILLAGE
SCHOOL DISTRICT v. GRUMET
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK
No. 93-517. Argued March 30, 1994 -- Decided June 27, 1994
The New York Village of Kiryas Joel is a religious enclave of Satmar Hasidim,
practitioners of a strict form of Judaism. Its incorporators intentionally
drew its boundaries under the State's general village incorporation law to
exclude all but Satmars. The village fell within the Monroe-Woodbury Central
School District until a special state statute, 1989 N. Y. Laws, ch. 748,
carved out a separate district that follows village lines. Although the
statute gives a locally elected school board plenary authority over primary
and secondary education in the village, the board currently runs only a
special education program for handicapped children; other village children
attend private religious schools, which do not offer special educational
services. Shortly before the new district began operations, respondents and
others brought this action claiming, inter alia, that Chapter 748 violates the
Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. The state trial court granted
summary judgment for respondents, and both the intermediate appellate court
and the New York Court of Appeals affirmed, ruling that Chapter 748's primary
effect was impermissibly to advance religion.
Held: The judgment is affirmed.
81 N. Y. 2d 518, 618 N. E. 2d 94, affirmed.
JUSTICE SOUTER delivered the opinion of the Court with respect to Parts
II-B, II-C, and III, concluding that Chapter 748 violates the Establishment
Clause. Pp. 14-22.
(a) Because the Kiryas Joel Village School District did not receive
its new governmental authority simply as one of many communities eligible for
equal treatment under a general law, there is no assurance that the next
religious community seeking a school district of its own will receive one.
The anomalously case-specific creation of this district for a religious
community leaves the Court without any way to review such state action for the
purpose of safeguarding the principle that government should not prefer one
religion to another, or religion to irreligion. Nor can the historical
context furnish any reason to suppose that the Satmars are merely one in a
series of similarly benefited communities, the special Act in this case being
entirely at odds with New York's historical trend. Pp. 14-17.
(b) Although the Constitution allows the State to accommodate
religious needs by alleviating special burdens, Chapter 748 crosses the line
from permissible accommodation to impermissible establishment. There are,
however, several alternatives for providing bilingual and bicultural special
education to Satmar children that do not implicate the Establishment Clause.
The Monroe-Woodbury school district could offer an educationally appropriate
program at one of its public schools or at a neutral site near one of the
village's parochial schools, and if the state legislature should remain
dissatisfied with the local district's responsiveness, it could enact general
legislation tightening the mandate to school districts on matters of special
education or bilingual and bicultural offerings. Pp. 17-20.
JUSTICE SOUTER, joined by JUSTICE BLACKMUN, JUSTICE STEVENS, and
JUSTICE GINSBURG, concluded in Part II-A that by delegating the State's
discretionary authority over public schools to a group defined by its common
religion, Chapter 748 brings about an impermissible "fusion" of governmental
and religious functions. See Larkin v. Grendel's Den, Inc., 459 U.S. 116,
126, 127. That a religious criterion was the defining test is shown by the
legislature's undisputed knowledge that the village was exclusively Satmar
when the statute was adopted; by the fact that the creation of such a small
and specialized school district ran uniquely counter to customary districting
practices in the State; and by the district's origin in a special and unusual
legislative Act rather than the State's general laws for school district
organization. The result is that the legislature has delegated civic
authority on the basis of religious belief rather than on neutral principles.
Pp. 7-14.
JUSTICE KENNEDY, agreeing that the Kiryas Joel Village School District
violates the Establishment Clause, concluded that the school district's real
vice is that New York created it by drawing political boundaries on the basis
of religion. See, e.g., Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. ___, ___-___. There is more
than a fine line between the voluntary association that leads to a political
community comprised of people who share a common religious faith, and the
forced separation that occurs when the government draws explicit political
boundaries on the basis of peoples' faith. In creating the district in
question, New York crossed that line. Pp. 8-10.
SOUTER, J., announced the judgment of the Court and delivered the
opinion of the Court with respect to Parts I, II-B, II-C, and III, in which
BLACKMUN, STEVENS, O'CONNOR, and GINSBURG, JJ., joined, and an opinion with
respect to Parts II (introduction) and II-A, in which BLACKMUN, STEVENS, and
GINSBURG, JJ., joined. BLACKMUN, J., filed a concurring opinion. STEVENS,
J., filed a concurring opinion, in which BLACKMUN and GINSBURG, JJ., joined.
O'CONNOR, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the
judgment. KENNEDY, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment. SCALIA,
J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which REHNQUIST, C. J., and THOMAS, J.,
joined.
***********************************************************************
* *
* American Atheists website: http://www.atheists.org *
* PO Box 140195 FTP: ftp://ftp.atheists.org *
* Austin, TX 78714-0195 *
* Voice: (512) 458-1244 Dial-THE-ATHEIST: *
* FAX: (512) 467-9525 (512) 458-5731 *
* *
* Atheist Viewpoint TV: avtv@atheists.org *
* Info on American Atheists: info@atheists.org, *
* & American Atheist Press include your name and mailing address *
* AANEWS -Free subscription: aanews-request@listserv.atheists.org *
* and put "info aanews" in message body *
* *
* This text may be freely downloaded, reprinted, and/other *
* otherwise redistributed, provided appropriate point of *
* origin credit is given to American Atheists. *
* *
***********************************************************************
Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the
author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and
opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The
opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.