*********************************************************
SO YOU BELIEVE IN GOD?
by BARBARA SMOKER
President, National Secular Society (Great Britain)
*********************************************************
People who believe in a divine creator, trying to
live their lives in obedience to his supposed wishes and
in expectation of a supposed eternal reward, are victims
of the greatest confidence trick of all time.
A children's hospital will provide you with ample
evidence against the existence of a being that is both
all-powerful and all-loving. And even if some specious
explanation is contrived for the sufferings of humanity
-- such as its giving us opportunities for merit, or its
being caused by the "sin" of Adam or that of ourselves
or our parents -- what about the suffering of animals,
during the many millions of years before mankind came on
the scene? Since all life and its evolution are based
on the principle of the weakest going to the wall, the
creator, if the universe really were deliberately
created, would be a monster of unimaginable cruelty --
enjoying the sight of one animal devouring another,
condoning the wastage of a myriad doomed species, and
taking sadistic pleasure in the miseries of mankind. If
our promised heaven means spending eternity in the
company of such a monster, let alone in lickspittle
adoration of him or it, what self-respecting human being
would want "salvation"?
If the alleged creator really were all-powerful,
then he certainly could not be a god of love. If he
really were a god of love, then he must be so incompetent
that it would surely have been better had he left
creation uncreated.
What is the I.Q. of "divine intelligence"? Since
it apparently scores no better than random chance, and
has learned nothing at all from billions of years of
trial and error, "divine intelligence" would be put to
shame by the powers of adaptability exhibited by the
least of its supposed creatures.
To say that god is good is meaningless unless his
alleged goodness is to be judged by some independent
criterion -- that is, by human values. Therefore, when
god-believers argue that human values must come from god
they are chasing their own tails.
Most god-believers also postulate god as an
explanation for existence itself. But if existence needs
to be explained, the god-theory fails to explain it, for
it leaves us with the necessity of explaining why and how
god exists. The assertion that god has existed from all
eternity, uncaused, is no advance on the hypothesis that
matter (or energy) has existed in varying forms -- from
all eternity, uncaused.
Now just consider the vastness of the universe in
relation to ourselves. Would an overlord of the universe
be likely to take a special interest in the doings of
individual members of a particular animal species,
recently evolved on a small satellite of an inconspicuous
star, among the billions of stars of a certain galaxy,
itself one of billions of galaxies?
Is ours the only planet anywhere inhabited by a
species comparable in intelligence with man? If so, and
if the creator's main concern is therefore assumed to be
with man, why should he create such a vast universe to
house so few of us? Besides, with such a huge choice of
territory available, why did he not choose a less hostile
environment for us?
If the more likely supposition is made that there
are other colonies of intelligent sentient beings
scattered about the universe, then god-believers must
assume either that god has an equal concern for all --
presumably, for instance in Christian terms, sacrificing
his son more than once -- or else, with supreme
arrogance, that earth is his chosen planet and man his
chosen species.
Even more arrogant, and selfish in the extreme,
is the assumption, within the context of our own planet
at this particular moment in time, that I and mine
(especially in the more affluent areas of the planet) are
god's chosen few. Although this is rarely admitted, it
is clearly implied in every prayer of thanksgiving. To
say grace, knowing that people on this globe are
starving, indicates a highly selfish acquiescence in the
arrogantly supposed favoritism of the almighty. A really
decent god-believer, far from giving thanks for the food
and good health and fortune enjoyed by himself and his
family and close friends, would surely curse god for his
neglect of the hungry, the sick and the tormented,
throughout the world.
To imagine that god wants prayers and hymns of
praise is to make him out a sort of oriental potentate;
praying for favors is an attempt to get him to change
his allegedly all-wise mind.
To say that "god moves in mysterious ways" is to
put up a smokescreen of mystery behind which fantasy may
survive in spite of all the facts.
Originally published by the National Secular
Society, London, England.
Copyright National Secular Society. All rights reserved.
Posted on this system with permission.
Printed copies of this pamphlet can be obtained from: American Atheist
Press, P. O. Box 140195, Austin, Texas 78714-0195. Stock #8710. Please
refer to current catalog and price list for pricing and availability.
***********************************************************************
* *
* American Atheists website: http://www.atheists.org *
* PO Box 140195 FTP: ftp://ftp.atheists.org *
* Austin, TX 78714-0195 *
* Voice: (512) 458-1244 Dial-THE-ATHEIST: *
* FAX: (512) 467-9525 (512) 458-5731 *
* *
* Atheist Viewpoint TV: avtv@atheists.org *
* Info on American Atheists: info@atheists.org, *
* & American Atheist Press include your name and mailing address *
* AANEWS -Free subscription: aanews-request@listserv.atheists.org *
* and put "info aanews" in message body *
* *
* This text may be freely downloaded, reprinted, and/other *
* otherwise redistributed, provided appropriate point of *
* origin credit is given to American Atheists. *
* *
***********************************************************************
Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the
author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and
opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The
opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.