Msg # 202
Date: 11 Sep 90 15:32:56
From: G. Adam Stanislav
To: Camille Lockyer
Subj: Re: General Text Files
____________________________________________________________________________
EID:1081 027df5b0
MSGID: 1:129/39 958f2b44
> of churches. Do you want names? These people are the
> funde's of whom
> I speak and they don't even consider catholics
> christians or mormons.
I am not going to loose any sleep over fundamentalists not considering
Catholics Christians. The Catholic Church was founded by Christ himself, how
more Christian can it get?
Fundamentalism exists in any religion, spirituality, ideology that has been
around long enough. Khomeini was a fundamentalist Moslem, yet that is no
reason to claim all Moselms are fanatics. Hitler was a fundamentalist
Socialist, yet that does not make all Socialists anti-human.
Some people in New Age movement say the name contains many other words
hidden, words that tell us about the name bearer. So what words can we find
in fundamentalism (this is supposed to be any word that can be made out of
some or all letters in the name).
Well, quite obviously, it starts with FUN, and indeed those people are funny!
It also contains both FUND and FUNDS. They are successful fund-raisers, are
they not. Many a fundamentalist preacher has raised millions.
The word DAMN can be constructed from within fundamentalism. Perhaps that is
why they are so concerned with eternal damnation, after all that word will
stay in their name forever.
You can find TALISMAN in it. They indeed expect help from external sources,
rather than from within. They also expect this help to come automatically
once certain conditions are met.
MAN as well as MEN can be found. Perhaps that is why there is no
understanding of the feminine principle in God. Indeed the word MALE can be
found easily but FEMALe is just one letter short, thus suggesting the woman
is somehow subject to the man. Yet, we can find the Latin word for woman
carefully hidden in FEMINA which suggests women can actually get their
influence in fundamentalism but must do it a conver-up manner.
MENTAL is there as well, which is not even hidden. It is the central part of
the word.
And of course FUNDAMENTAL suggests, all things considered, they are
fundamentally wrong. If you combine the latter two with LAME what do you get?
I'd rather not comment on the fact they are hiding my name, ADAM, in their
own. Perhaps it is a sign of hope they may restore their original innocence,
the state before the original sin some day. Unfortunately, because of all the
other influences, they have ways to go.
Shall I continue? There are other words you could find in the word
fundamentalism (gee, did you ever receive any MAIL from them?), but the above
are the most obvious, and thus most influential ones.
Adam
--- FD 1.99c
* Origin: Children of the Light, unite! (1:129/39)
SEEN-BY: 100/523 103/901 129/5 39 161/7 301/6 9 374/14 382/42
PATH: 374/14
Msg # 215
Date: 12 Sep 90 11:08:42
From: G. Adam Stanislav
To: Camille Lockyer
Subj: Analysis of the word "Fundamentalism"
____________________________________________________________________________
EID:1081 027a0510
MSGID: 1:129/39 960a5a2b
Another important idea came to mind overnight in the analysis of the word
"Fundamentalism".
We can find words like FALSE, LIE, and LIES in it. But we cannot find "liar".
This seems to fit interestingly with my experience with fundamentalists, at
least the few I got a chance to meet, here in the North (Pittsburgh, PA):
They are extremely sincere about their beliefs. I see in them more victims
than victimizers. I don't agree with them, but usually cannot blame them of
evil intent.
Of course, that can be a very dangerous quality, especially when we consider
such "victims" as Khomeini. I bet he was very sincere in his fundamentalism,
and believed it was the right thing to slay the perceived enemies of Allah,
but his fanatical sincerity hardly justifies his actions.
By the way, the word SLAIN can also be found in fundamentalism. But "slayer"
is not there. Maybe we should not be sticking such extremes as Khomeini in
the same bag with them? On the other hand, STALIN can be built up from the
letters in the word fundamentalism...
An interesting thought which also coincides with my experience of them being
sincere is that while we can find DAMN in it, as mentioned last night, we
cannot find "condemn". Many of them sincerely believe the rest of us are
heading for eternal damnation, but they do not condemn us, rather are trying
to save us (in their viewpoint, that is).
They are going to LAST for a while
Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the
author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and
opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The
opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.