1. If creationsim is capable of enduring the scientific method, then
(a) there are testable hypotheses and predictions made by some
creationist theory (by the way, what IS the theory of creationism?),
(b) there are repeatable experiments which will yield data bearing
on the confirmation or disconfirmation of the theory (by the way,
what IS the theory of creationism?),
(c) there are publically reviewable ("peer review") observations that
bear on the confirmation / disconfirmation of the theory (by the way,
what IS the theory of creationism?), and
(d) there are evidentially supported ("predicted") conclusions, drawn
from experimental / observational data such that these conclusions are
better supported by all the available data than any rival theory (by
the way, just what IS the theory of creationism, anyway?).
2. Score for creationism: not (a), not (b), not (c), and not (d).
Therefore, Creationism is not capable of enduring the scientific method.
It is not scientific. It is an occult theology.
Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the
author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and
opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The
opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.