Evolutionary Synthesis
What was the value, and influence, of the "evolutionary
synthesis," the theory (or theories) of evolution which dominated
biology from the late 1930's until recently? Here are the views of
Janis Antonovics (Botany, Duke), in his 1986 Presidential Address
to the American Society of Naturalists:
[M]y thesis is that the Evolutionary Synthesis failed in many
serious and insidious ways. I propose that the Synthesis had
little direct effect on the progress of evolutionary biology as a
discipline and that, at the conceptual level, it may even have
hindered rather than furthered our understanding of evolution.
Many of the negative effects of the Synthesis have lasted to this
day in terms of the institutional and conceptual structure of the
field. I suggest that it is probably time that, rather than
trying to finish the Synthesis as Eldredge...has exhorted, we
instead earnestly work to dismantle it.
Similar interesting and startling opinions are included in
Antonovics's recent paper, "The Evolutionary Dys-Synthesis: Which
Bottle for Which Wine?" American Naturalist , Vol. 129: 321-331,
March 1987.
Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the
author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and
opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The
opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.