La. Schools Reject Evolution Disclaimer
The Associated Press
BATON ROUGE, La. -- Louisiana's state school board rejected a proposal
Thursday to place a disclaimer in high school biology textbooks that
would state that evolution is only a theory.
Only Alabama has such a statewide disclaimer, but school districts
elsewhere have issued their own. One suburban Atlanta school district,
Cobb County, was sued by the American Civil Liberties Union in August
over similar disclaimers it placed in thousands of textbooks.
The Louisiana board rejected the disclaimers on a 7-3 vote.
"I am not prepared to go back to the Dark Ages," board
President Paul Pastorek said Tuesday after a board committee approved
the disclaimer. "I don't think state boards should dictate
editorial content of school textbooks."
The disclaimer would have stated that the theory of evolution "still
leaves many unanswered questions about the origin of life."
It also would have told students: "Study hard and keep an open
mind. Someday you may contribute to the theories of how living things
appeared on earth."
) 2002 The Associated Press
Ohio School Board OKs Science Standards
By Liz Sidoti
COLUMBUS, Ohio -- The state school board unanimously approved science
standards Tuesday that more strongly advocate the teaching of
evolution while allowing students to fully critique the theory's
legitimacy.
The standards do not require the teaching or testing of the alternate
concept of "intelligent design," which holds that the universe
is guided by a higher intelligence. The vote was 18-0, with one member
absent. In October, the board indicated it would adopt the new
standards.
The board has struggled since January to write the science curriculum
guidelines, which teachers will be encouraged - but not required - to
follow because they will be the basis of new exams that students must
pass to graduate.
Under the new standards, evolution will be the only origin-of-life
theory covered on the tests, meaning schools that avoid teaching
Charles Darwin's theory that life evolved by natural processes would
risk putting their students at a disadvantage.
Local school districts can still decide to teach intelligent design -
the idea that life must have been designed by a non-specified higher
power because it is so complex - or other theories besides evolution.
Some already teach other concepts.
The current standards for teaching science to the state's 1.8 million
students do not mention the word "evolution." They recommend
teaching "change through time" but do not specify what that
involves.
Tuesday's vote followed a series of public hearings and a debate
between scientists and experts that attracted 1,500 people. The board
said it received 20,000 letters and e-mail messages from across the
country.
The vote was applauded by people on both sides of the issue.
"Intelligent design is out altogether. Now there's no way it will
appear on standardized tests," said Patricia Princehouse, a
philosophy professor at Case Western Reserve University and founder
of Ohio Citizens for Science, a pro-evolution group.
Critics argue intelligent design is actually creationism, which the
U.S. Supreme Court has prohibited from public schools as a violation
of the separation of church and state. Intelligent design supporters
deny that, saying that no designer is specified.
But backers of intelligent design also claimed victory because the
standards will still permit teachers to examine the concept. They also
say the simple inclusion of the words "intelligent design"
in the standards helps legitimize the theory in mainstream society.
"They've mentioned it. They've made a national issue out of it and
they've drawn more attention to intelligent design than we could have
ever drawn," said Jody Sjogren, co-founder of the national
Intelligent Design Network and director of its Ohio office.
---
On the Net:
State School Board: http://www.ode.state.oh.us/board
Ohio Citizens for Science: http://ecology.cwru.edu/ohioscience
Science Excellence for All Ohioans: http://www.sciohio.org
) 2002 The Associated Press
Any text written by the creationist cult which may be quoted within this
criticial examination of the creationist cult is provided according to
U. S. Code Title 17 "Fair Use" dictates which may be reviewed at
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html
"You can lie about ICR all you want." --
Jason Daniel Henderson
"Thank you for your permission however there's never any need
to. Creationist propaganda is already self-debunking." --
Fredric L. Rice
Thursday, December 12, 2002; 3:47 PM
Associated Press Writer
Tuesday, December 10, 2002; 9:48 PM
This web site is not affiliated or associated with any creationist cult in any way and neither the web site host, the web site owner, or any of the authors which assisted in debunking creationist nonsense are in any way connected with any creationist cult.
E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank