The notoriously bizarre Institute for Creation Research (sic) cult
routinely publishes equally bizarre religious notions which they wish to
pretend are some how scientific. This text file takes some of the cult's
own bizarre publications and takes a look at them in extract to show just
how nutty (verging on the insane) these "Modern Day Flat Earth
Society" nuts actually are.
Copyright by The Skeptic Tank, 2002, all rights reserved. Permission is
granted to disseminate this criticism freely provided no fees or costs are
associated with the document's free distribution among academia and the lay
public.
<heh> This is a good one. At times a new bizarrely shaped brick is
added to the cult's crumbeling foundation of ignorance to try to shore up a
sagging and outdated belief system and this is one of them. They come up
rarely, though... and it's a damn shame since it's always refreshing to
get new freakishly bizarre claims to debunk - and then there's always the
entertainment value which can't be ignored.
Most creationist crap has been around for centuries, passed down from
one ignorant savage to another. Probably the only two fairly new claims
has been equally amusing and freakish claims about moon dust and this
one, the Earth's magnetic field. Let's see what we're being told to
believe this time, shall we?
The idiot claim that the Earth's magnetic field some how proves that the
Earth is less than 5 billion years old has been soundly debunked and you
may review some of those debunkings at:
-- Begin quoted text in extract -=-
The earth's magnetic field is a powerful witness for
a world much younger than the billions of years required
by evolutionary theories.
-=- End quoted text in extract
<laughing> And if the Earth's magnetic field could talk, hopefully it would tell this guy he's an idiot. Let's see if we can help scramble this cultists' eggs.
The first amusing claim is that the Earth's magnetic field is decaying at an alarming rate:
-- Begin quoted text in extract -=-
The Field Is Decaying Rapidly
Let's start the story with the most prominent feature
of the field today -- its very rapid decay.
-=- End quoted text in extract
No it's not. This insane claim is debunked solidly all over the Internet and, in fact, it's solidly debunked elsewhere on The Skeptic Tank. The bizarre notion is that because there's fluctuation in the Earth's magnetic field strength and because it's currently on the decreasing side of its cycle, that proves the Christian gods exist and that evolution doesn't happen some how.
How does the cult manage to piece together a claim that doesn't make them sound like they're, well, retarded? Short answer: they don't. No amount of twisting and hammering will build an argument that'll hold together to support such an idiot notion. The result of the attempt is something to be pitied, I must say.
Long answer: Creationists try to pretend that because the Earth's magnetic field is currently on decline in strength, it must have always been on the decline since the Earth was "created." Since science shows the Earth is around five billion years old, the Earth's magnetic field should have expired by now. Yep. And obviously since creationists demand that the magnetic field should be long gone according to "evolutionists" (who say no such thing) evolution couldn't happen since evolution had not enough time to work as it's observed to. Ergo "gods dun it."
It will be interesting to see how the cult explains-away the fact that the Earth's magnetic field is cyclic and that it has actually reversed itself a number of times. Do you think they'll even mention it?
-- Begin quoted text in extract -=-
The average "intensity" of the earth's magnetic field
has decreased exponentially by about 7% since its first
careful measurement in 1829...
-=- End quoted text in extract
I'm tempted to point out that the average intelligence of creationists seems to be on an exponential decline but there's no need: it's obvious. The cultist goes on to explain that the Earth's magnetic field is:
-- Begin quoted text in extract -=-
....slowly losing energy because of the electrical
resistance of the core..."
-=- End quoted text in extract
No it's not. The Earth's magnetic field is created by the movement of magma in the Earth's core. Indeed, the ICR cult admits that it's well aware of the fact:
-- Begin quoted text in extract -=-
The free-decay theory contradicts the evolutionary "dynamo"
theories which claim that complex processes in the earth's
core have converted heat energy into electrical energy, much
like an electric generator, maintaining the field for billions
of years....
-=- End quoted text in extract
What stupidity. As usual the ICR cult continues to express its abject ignorance as to what evolution is and what evolution is not. Evolution has nothing to do with the sciences which examines the formation and maintenance of the Earth's magnetic field. That doesn't stop this bizarre cult from trying to claim that the science is some how "evolutionary."
What we find its that when a creationist runs up against something in the sciences which negates one of their pet notions, the thing to do is label it "evolutionary" and hope that their followers -- who already think that evolution doesn't happen some how -- will swallow the latest idiot notion whole simply by labeling it as part of evolution. Bizarre.
-- Begin quoted text in extract -=-
Many intelligent scientists have been working on
dynamo theories for over four decades without great
success.
-=- End quoted text in extract
Might as well give up and demand "gods dun it."
-- Begin quoted text in extract -=-
Furthermore, recent measurements of electric currents in
the sea floor weigh heavily against the most popular class
of dynamo theories.
-=- End quoted text in extract
In fact an examination of sea floors around techtonic plates that are in seporation shows that the Earth's magnetic field has repeatedly reversed itself over the years. And in fact the very age of the rock samples taken fro sea floors around such volcanic cracks negate utterly the cult's bizarre notions that the Earth is less than 10,000 years old.
The cultist takes a side trip into the magnetic measurements of bricks, pottery, and rocks heated by camp fires, all of which tells us nothing about the cycles the Earth's magnetic fields go through. Let's see if the ICR cult ever gets around to mentioning the fact, shall we?
Ah, yes, after endless stupidity they get around to admiting it. Does that stop them from continueing to try to pretend that the Earth's magnetic field should be gone now? Nope!
-- Begin quoted text in extract -=-
Paleomagnetic data show that while the geologic strata were
being laid down, the earth's magnetic field reversed its
direction hundreds of times.
-=- End quoted text in extract
There. That alone should put "paid" to the idiot notion. Sadly, the
propaganda piece tries to remove the noose around their neck. Watch
as the nut sways gently in the breeze in a section amusingly titled,
"A creationist theory for reversals and fluctuations."
-- Begin quoted text in extract -=-
-=- End quoted text in extract
Did we miss something? Oh yeah, some how the evidence for this "flood
of ignorance" thing is missing. Leaving alone for the moment the fact
that there's no evidence for any "flood," this cult doesn't seem to
realize what would happen to the surface of the Earth if magma were to
be moving so quickly. Convection moves magma... what does the ICR
cult offer to explain how massive amounts of magma cold be moved so
quickly as to form the history of magnetic reversals as evidenced in
sea floor samples? Pixies? Fairies? Oh. "Gods dun it." Right.
Then, to place the other foot along side the other, we get:
-- Begin quoted text in extract -=-
-=- End quoted text in extract
No, actually all life on Earth would have been exterminated and the heat
driving such convection movements the cult is imagining would have
ripped the old planet up into fragments. Then the cult has to explain
where the added energy came from and where it went after it was done.
But then of course the cult has to explain where all the extra water
came from for their "flood of ignorance" and then explain where it all
disappeared to afterward.
So after admitting that magnetic reversals have taken place -- and will
take place again in the future -- the ICR cult proceeds to pretend that
they all some how occured within a few thousand years. That allows the
nutters to glibly proclaim:
-- Begin quoted text in extract -=-
-=- End quoted text in extract
Which is of course wrong. Amusingly the cult then askes the rhetorical
question:
-- Begin quoted text in extract -=-
-=- End quoted text in extract
Um, yes, you forgot to provide evidence for this "flood" of
yours.
Any text written by the creationist cult which may be quoted within this
criticial examination of the creationist cult is provided according to
U. S. Code Title 17 "Fair Use" dictates which may be reviewed at
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html
"You can lie about ICR all you want." --
Jason Daniel Henderson
"Thank you for your permission however there's never any need
to.
This web site is not affiliated or associated with any creationist cult in
any way and neither the web site host, the web site owner, or any of the
authors which assisted in debunking creationist nonsense are in any way
connected with any creationist cult.
In 1986 I suggested that strong flows of the fluid in the
earth's core could produce rapid reversals of the field
during and after the Genesis flood....
The resulting disturbances in the core would cause the
field intensity at the earth's surface to fluctuate up
and down for thousands of years afterwards.
The Field's "Energy" Has Always Decreased
Are There Any Loopholes in the Logic?
Creationist propaganda is already self-debunking." --
Fredric L. Rice
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the author
or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and opinions of
the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The opinions may or may
not be those of the Chairman of The Organized Crime Civilian Response®.