The notoriously bizarre Institute for Creation Research (sic) cult
routinely publishes equally bizarre religious notions which they wish to
pretend are some how scientific. This text file takes some of the cult's
own bizarre publications and takes a look at them in extract to show just
how nutty (verging on the insane) these "Modern Day Flat Earth
Society" nuts actually are.
Copyright by The Skeptic Tank, 2002, all rights reserved. Permission
is granted to disseminate this criticism freely provided no fees or
costs are associated with the document's free distribution among
academia and the lay public.
This one proves to be highly amusing. Here we have a look at the ICR
cult's propaganda piece titled, "Geocentricity and Creation." I
have a wonder if the creationist is going to make an appeal to the readers
that the Earth really _is_ the center of the universe, and that the Sun
orbits around the Earth.
After reading ICR cult propaganda for years, it wouldn't surprise me.
Let's go see! We're given a bit of history, nothing unusual so far.
The cult at least acknowledges that the heliocentric is accepted today.
That's a plus.
Interesting. We get a little bit of a botched explanation of some
of Albert Einstein's work, and then we get to a bloody train wreck:
-- Begin quoted text in extract -=-
-=- End quoted text in extract
Not quite but close enough. Einstein actually says that there is
no perfered frame of reference when making observations on bodies
that are in motion. And in fact "stationary" according to Albert
s merely an artifact of two or more objects that are in fact in
motion but not when related to each other. Here's the train wreck:
-- Begin quoted text in extract -=-
-=- End quoted text in extract
Good frocking grief! I've seen a lot of nuts try to derive
bizarre confirmations of their little pet occut notions twisting
Einstein's theories of relativity yet I've got to think that this
is about the most profoundly twisted attempt I've yet seen.
See, there's no perfered frame of reference so any claims you want
to make about something they're all equally valid. It's not that
the Earth rotates, it's really a matter of the Sun rising in the
East every morning because the Sun is in orbit around the Earth.
Oh, then you have to look at the proper motion of the Sun against
the background of the stars in the local group. Not only is the
Earth in orbit around the Sun (trust me, Creationists: it is) but
the Sun is in orbit around the collective center of the stellar
masses of the galaxy which are themselves in orbit around the center
of mass of the local group of galacies. And the local group is
likewise orbiting other groups of galactic clusters.
So, according to the ICR cult, since everybody's orbiting everyone
else and since Albert Einstein showed us that there's no perfered
frame of reference, the Earth could actually be the center of the
Solar System exactly as claimed in the classical Christianic
mythologies.
Good grief.
Next the ICR cult gets into what they think the Christianic
mythologies have to say about the Earth being the center of the
universe / center of the Solar System. First the cult tries to
claim that the Earth is some how special, created before the
trillions of stars, planets, moons et al. that surround little
old Earth.
Then the cult makes this amusing claim which I'm sure NASA and the
Jet Propulsion Lab would be startled to hear:
-- Begin quoted text in extract -=-
-=- End quoted text in extract
The investigation of the other planets in the solar system does no
such thing. Spacecraft sent to the inner plants and to the oter
planets and moons find that the Solar System is filled with planets
and moons that look exactly like the Earth looked billions of years
ago.
Europa is confirmed to have water ice on its surface and coupled to
geothermal energy providing the possibility of termal vents on the
ocean floors, Europa holds considerable promise for harboring life.
A check of the inner system shows free water on the surface of
Mars. The craft humanity has landed on Mars show a planet that is
remarkably like the Earth. Indeed, testing and development of
various Mars landed craft was conducted in California and Nevada
desert areas specifically because the two planets are remarkable
similar in many details.
Ignoring the exploration of the Solar System entirely the nut
eventually demands:
-- Begin quoted text in extract -=-
-=- End quoted text in extract
My guess is that the ICR cult has yet to hear about bacteria that
lives comfortably in boiling hot water and mud proving that the
underwater thermal vents of geographically active moons that have
liquid water on them can very easily have life on them.
It looks like the ICR cult will ignore parts of their paper idol
when they want, picking and chosing what they'll read and what they'll
not read like it were a salad bar:
-- Begin quoted text in extract -=-
-=- End quoted text in extract
The Christian mythologies specificially describe the Earth as a flat
plate with a "firmament" cover. The mythologies also have the
"Satan" god showing "all the kingdoms of Earth" to the Jesus god
from a high mountain. All in keeping with the accepted ignorance
of the Earth at the time which held that the Earth was flat.
Here in the 21'st Century we still have a few people who have yet
to divest themselves of such notions.
While ignoring the fact that the Christanic mythologies specifically
describe a flat Earth -- "like a compass all around" -- it's bizarre
to see that the cult acknowledges the following problem:
-- Begin quoted text in extract -=-
-=- End quoted text in extract
"Controversial?" There's no controvery. The classical Christanic
mythologies claim the Earth's position is "fixed" when in fact it
is not. Mythologies aren't supposed to be believed any more than Wonder
Woman comic books are supposed to be believe. Ergo there is no
"conflict." There is, however, occult superstition
which attempts to deny what their own paper idol is telling them while
at the same time trying to demand that other claims -- such as a world-wide
global flood -- are actually some how factual.
After admitting that the mythologies throw creationists the problem,
the cure is to ignore it:
-- Begin quoted text in extract -=-
-=- End quoted text in extract
The ICR cult admits that their paper idol states that the Earth is some
how "fixed" in the "firmanent" and then the ICR cult
proceeds to glibly demand that their mythologies say nothing about it.
<groan> The weak excuse that gets muttered at this point in the
cult's propaganda is that the "fixed" earth is some how taken
out of context when in fact anybody can open the mythologies and read
all about it for themselves.
No mention of the fact that the "Jesus" god was shown "all
the kingdoms of Earth" from a mountain top by the "Satan" god.
Now the ICR cult suddenly gives up trying to explain the scientific
blunders in their paper idol dealing with the Earth some how
being the center of the Solar System and some how being flat:
-- Begin quoted text in extract -=-
-=- End quoted text in extract
Well there you go. It's time to give up trying to crowbar your
freakishly bizarre occult notions into something that Science can
accept, and it's time to give up denying science so that said
freakishly bizarre occult notions can be held with a clear conscience.
All that's left is to refrain from trying to get creationism
presented as some how factual in the public schools. I knew that
this one would be amusing. It was. I didn't predict just how stupid
it would be, though.
Any text written by the creationist cult which may be quoted within this
criticial examination of the creationist cult is provided according to
U. S. Code Title 17 "Fair Use" dictates which may be reviewed at
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html
"You can lie about ICR all you want." --
Jason Daniel Henderson
"Thank you for your permission however there's never any need
to.
Einstein's theory of general relativity adds further to
the debate. It asserts that it is impossible for a human
observer to determine whether any material body is in a
state of absolute rest (i.e., immobile in space).
It claims that only motion of two material bodies relative
to one another can be physically detected. According to this
theory the geocentric and heliocentric viewpoints are equally
valid representations of reality, and it makes no sense
whatsoever scientifically to speak of one as being true and
the other false...
The Biblical doctrine of the uniqueness of the earth
is strongly supported by modern space exploration.
The earth gives every indication that it was specially
designed for life, and it is unique in this regard.
.... nowhere is it taught that the earth is the center
of the universe...
This leaves the more controversial assertion... that the
earth is motionless in space to be discussed.
Nowhere does the Bible set about to deal explicitly with
the question of whether the earth is moving through space
or not.
Geocentricity and creationism am really separate matters.
Because of the contrast in the way the Bible deals with
these two issues, I believe that attempts to link
geocentricity and creationism are ill-founded.
Creationist propaganda is already self-debunking." --
Fredric L. Rice
This web site is not affiliated or associated with any creationist cult in any way and neither the web site host, the web site owner, or any of the authors which assisted in debunking creationist nonsense are in any way connected with any creationist cult.
E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank