If creationism was fatal, I'd be all for it -- provided it was
a matter of choice and not forced upon innocent children. In
December of 1924, Henry Louis Mencken (1880-1956) wrote an article
for his column in the Baltimore Evening Sun wherein Mencken
proceeds to debunk the chiropractic quack medical fraud in
none-too-kind language. In part Mencken opines:
Mencken's debunking of the chiropractic fraud is quite lengthy,
covering the unfounded, unscientific, utterly unworkable claims
which the fraudulent chiropractic industry inflicts upon its
unwitted, ignorant victims. The article covers the fact that
the lowest morons of the Republic do the rest of us the grand
favor of removing themselves and their "get" from the gene pool
thanks to their often fatal belief the chiropractic fraud. For
Mencken, however, the fatalities aren't frequent enough:
And if that same man, having achieved lawfully a lovely
babe, hires a blacksmith to cure its diphtheria by pulling
its neck, then I do not resist the divine will that there
shall be one less radio fan in 1967. In such matters I
am convinced the laws of nature are far better guides
than the fiats and machinations of the medical busybodies
who now try to run us. If the later gentlemen had their
way, death, save at the hands of hangmen, Prohibition
agents, and other legalized assassins, would be abolished
altogether, and so that present differential in favor of
the enlightened would disappear.
I can't convince myself that would be of any good to
the world. On the contrary, it seems to me that the
current coddling of the half-witted should be stopped
before it goes too far -- if, indeed, it has not gone
too far already. To that end, nothing operates more
cheaply and effectively than the prosperity of quacks.
Every time a bottle of cancer specific goes through the
mails, Homo Americanus is improved to that extent. And
every time a chiropractor spits on his hands and proceeds
to treat a gastric ulcer by stretching the backbone,
the same high end is achieved.
I'm left wondering why mainstream newspapers are unwilling to
employ such straight forward rhetoric these days. Applauding
self-administered Darwinian selection at the hands of the
dim-witted that fall for the quack medical scams being sold on
every street corner seems rather unkind, but suggesting that
such self-administered selection improves the gene pool for the
betterment of the human species is unkinder still.
But is the suggestion truthful? It may be unkind to suggest
that when parents subject their offspring to fatal quack medical
scams, they're doing the human species a favor by improving the
breed, but is it truthful? Is the dim-wittedness which allows
a parent to believe quack medical claptrap a genetic trait which
is passed off to one's offspring? I don't think it is. I think
that children must be well indoctrinated into occult, magical
thinking and that if a child is allowed to develop normally,
employing science comes naturally to child who will grow up to
recognize quack medical scams for what they are and thus avoid them.
Parents who subject their children to fatal quack medical scams
don't improve the gene pool, but maybe they improve the health
and safety of their neighbors who might otherwise have been
contaminated by such occult, magical thinking. Better still
would be to leave their children alone and only subject
themselves to their fatal stupidity for the immediate
betterment of not only society in general but their children
in the specific.
Mencken apparently recognized the fact that moronic belief in
quack medical frauds like chiropractic weren't passed down to
offspring genetically; his comments appear to be more rhetoric
than actual wishful thinking. In fact he laments the fact that
chiropractic isn't totally and completely fatal:
Mencken wishes that chiropractic was perfect: that every believer
who subjects themselves to the fraud would improve the species by
dieing because of it.
Creationist occultism and magical thinking aren't fatal but
they're most certainly debilitative. If creationism was fatal
some how -- if creationism also required following the Biblical
mandate of drinking poison to prove one's faith, perhaps --
maybe it would have died out long ago and the rest of us wouldn't
have to look at these dim-witted morons trying to push their
occultism in our public schools. Creationism is like some kind
of seemingly endless infection from a modern day Typhoid Mary,
a debilitative disease which society must suffer. (Now we must
expend effort to inoculate ourselves and our children but doing
so makes us stronger.)
In a world-wide marketplace I can't imagine how a believer in
creationist occultism could manage to compete successfully with
students who actually employ science. I can't imagine ever
seeing an oil industry executive examining resumes and considering
calling in a "graduate" of the Institute for Creation Research
cult's mock "school" to help out with the company's oil exploration
program knowing that the dim-witted moron on the resume thinks
the Earth is only some 10,000 years old.
While not fatal, the best we can achieve is that the sons and
daughters of creationist parents are unable to compete in the market
place along side our own sons and daughters who we allow to learn
and apply science. Our society needs its ditch diggers and its
fast food workers; our society needs its lower class (even if we
pretend to be a classless society.) Isn't it so convenient that
creationists have volunteered to fill that requirement?
Any text written by the creationist cult which may be quoted within this
criticial examination of the creationist cult is provided according to
U. S. Code Title 17 "Fair Use" dictates which may be reviewed at
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html
"You can lie about ICR all you want." --
Jason Daniel Henderson
"Thank you for your permission however there's never any need
to. Creationist propaganda is already self-debunking." --
Fredric L. Rice
Thus the multiplication of chiropractors in the Republic
gives me a great deal of pleasure. It is agreeable to see
so many morons getting slaughtered, and it is equally
agreeable to see so many other morons getting rich.
I repeat that it eases and soothes me to see them so
prosperous, for they counteract the evil work of the
so-called science of public hygiene, which now seeks
to make morons immortal. If a man, being ill of a pus
appendix, resorts to a shaved and fumigated longshoreman
to have it disposed of and submits willingly to a
treatment involving balancing him on McBurney's spot
and playing on his vertebrae as on a concertina, then
I am willing, for one, to believe that he is badly
wanted in Heaven.
But chiropractic, of course, is not perfect. It has
superb potentialities, but only too often they are
not converted into concrete cadavers.
This web site is not affiliated or associated with any creationist cult in any way and neither the web site host, the web site owner, or any of the authors which assisted in debunking creationist nonsense are in any way connected with any creationist cult.
E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank