Note: the author failed to understand the distinction of isochrons
and psudo-isochrons, which yields his conclusions in error. Write
to him and ask him to look at isochrons, not psudo-isochrons.
-- Begin quoted text in extract -=-
-=- End quoted text in extract
No they don't. Scientists don't "believe" anything. They will
either accept or reject a notion based upon scientific method however they
don't apply "beliefs" to science.
Here you have the ICR cult trying to pretend that scientists employ the
same level of willful ignorance that cultists do in a vain attempt to try
to drag science down to the creationist's level, it looks like.
-- Begin quoted text in extract -=-
-=- End quoted text in extract
And as always if the cult can find rock samples that are
"domestic" he or she should present the find to the scientific
community rather than complain about it in a propaganda rag.
-- Begin quoted text in extract -=-
-=- End quoted text in extract
And in fact the cultist is just plain wrong. Evolution deals with the
origins of species, not with the age of the Solar System. Planetologists
-- not biology scientists as this cultist asserts -- together with
geologists and paleontologists are the scientists that examine and
investigation the age of the Earth. Cosologists are the scientists that
investigate the age of the Solar System, the planets, stars, and the
universe in general.
This cultist seem to want to pretend that all the endless sciences which
debunk creationist nonsense are some how some kind of conspiracy that has
its roots in the biological sciences. In a word: stupid.
-- Begin quoted text in extract -=-
-=- End quoted text in extract
And yet the cultist believes the Epic of Gilgamesh is some how true, it
looks like.
-- Begin quoted text in extract -=-
-- Begin quoted text in extract -=-
To the point of insanity, it looks like, to me -- unless that damage was
caused by an unfortunate beliefe in mythology. Here we have a large number
of sciences which have applied numerous methodologies which are all in
agreement as to the age of the Earth. This unfortunate individual looks
at one method, doesn't understand it by all indications, claims it some
how doesn't work, and then glibly proclaims the following:
-- Begin quoted text in extract -=-
-=- End quoted text in extract
How utterly stupid. As if the directly observed fact of evolution some how
disappears because this nut doesn't understand science.
-- Begin quoted text in extract -=-
-=- End quoted text in extract
Any text written by the creationist cult which may be quoted within this
criticial examination of the creationist cult is provided according to
U. S. Code Title 17 "Fair Use" dictates which may be reviewed at
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html
"You can lie about ICR all you want." --
Jason Daniel Henderson
"Thank you for your permission however there's never any need
to.
Evolutionists believe...
...that the oldest rocks on earth are meteorites.
Lead-lead isochron plots are the current way that evolutionists
have estimated the age of the earth at 4.6 billion years....
As a creationist I find these series of assumptions more
than I can accept.
I am even offended.
It seems that one has to buy an evolutionary cosmology
before one can determine the age of the earth to be 4.6
billion years!
Steven Austin, Ph.d
Institute for Creation Research
PO Box 2667
El Cajon, CA 92021
Creationist propaganda is already self-debunking." --
Fredric L. Rice
This web site is not affiliated or associated with any creationist cult in any way and neither the web site host, the web site owner, or any of the authors which assisted in debunking creationist nonsense are in any way connected with any creationist cult.
E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank