????? Evolution ?????
I have talked with so many people that "believe" evolution is
practically scientific fact, yet they have not examined the facts for
themselves. When you go out looking for a job, you examine the facts, how
much will I make, what benefits will I be provided with, will I like the
work and so on. Yet when looking at the possibilities of eternal life, so
many tend to conform with the world and omit a personal judgment. Ask
yourself, "Have I Ever Looked At The Facts" ?????
Evolution was conceived as a theory, then attempts were made to
scientifically back up the theory. Doesn't this seem to construct the
perfect atmosphere for one to assume prematurely? Wouldn't it be better to
look at the facts, and then construct a theory?????
Here are some "FACTS" evolutionists don't like to look at.
(1) Dinosaur and human footprints have been found together, in some
instances actually one on top of the other. The prints were examined by
experts and were concluded to be homosapien and dinosaur. Evolutionist
theories insist dinosaurs lived 1,000,000's of years before man.
(2) Scientist acknowledge the existence of cosmic dust. When the landing
craft for the APOLLO moon missions were being constructed, great care was
taken to construct the craft so it would be able to land on the 50 or so
FEET of space dust that would have accumulated on the moons surface over the
millions of years they thought the moon had been there. As you know, when
the landed they found only inches, which by the way according to there own
calculations would place the moon somewhere UNDER 10,000 years old, exactly
as the Bible states.
(3) Analysis of the earth magnetic field over the past 130 years, indicates
the strength of the field has been getting weaker each year. This
information has been graphed backwards to determine the earth magnetic filed
in the past. According to this information 30,000 years ago the magnetic
files would have been strong enough to generate temperatures in excess of
5000 degrees celsius. This temperature would be sufficient to vaporize all
the elements within the earth today.
(4) Scientist have been watching the sun shrink at a rate of .1% per
century. If you were to reverse this process 20,000,000 years, the sun
would have been large enough to touch the earth.
(5) Scientists know that comets are approximately the same age as the solar
system they circle. Studies have been made on the break down of the comets
elements (the commits tail) and indications point that this breakdown in it
entirety would take less than 10,000 years. That is to say, the commit
would be no more.
(6) Oil and gas deposits within the earth are under extremely high
pressure, this is the reason you get a gusher when you strike a deposit.
The deposit itself is stored with in a porus environment and is slowly
depressurizing. Since this is so, if the earth is 1,000,000's of years old,
the pressure would not have been able to sustain itself over this period of
time.
(7) If man did slowly evolve from a cell would there not be a tremendous
amount of fossil evidence that would support the evolving concept? We
should have tons of fossils that show how the cell became different forms of
life and slowly turned into man after many mutations. The fossile record is
quit the opposite. We have fossils of most of the living creatures that
exist on the earth today plus many more. So instead of creatures evolving
into many mutations (varieties) we are witnessing a decrease of the actual
varieties of living things.
(8) As pointed out in #7, evolution states that man came from a single
cell. Out of all the disorder that the Big Bang theory would cause,
evolutionist would like for you to believe that order came out of it in the
form of a single cell. How complicated is a cell then, it must be rather
simple if it was the first form of life. WRONG! The following is a quote
from National Geographic. "Even if we knew all there is to know how a cell
works, we would still be baffled. How a nerve cell create emotions,
thoughts, behavior, memory and other perceptions cannot yet, if indeed ever,
be described in the language of molecular biology."
One last thing in closing for you that think we were created by God,
but think that a day of the Bible seven day creation might have been more
than 24 hours as we know it. The Bible clearly stats that plant life was
created before God made the sun, well then, if one of God's days was say,
1000 years, how could the plants live that long without sunlight?
TAKE THE BIBLE FOR WHAT IT IS,
"THE WORD OF GOD"
Written at the Praise Board, Livonia MI (313)-471-6959 - 24 Hours, 3/12/24
Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the
author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and
opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The
opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.