---

[ref001] #apologetics: DEBATE LOGS - 4/21/96 #apologetics: DEBATE LOGS - 4/21/96 [01:35] _Q_ (serenity@slip170.UCS.ORST.EDU) joined #apologetics. [01:35] <_Q_> hey roy [01:35] <_Q_> you're all alone? [01:36] hello Q [01:36] i was looking up some info on the bot [01:37] <_Q_> were you abandoned by your compariots? [01:37] <_Q_> This channel seems to die a lot earlier than many others. [01:37] lol...i just got here myself :) [01:38] i suppose everyone has to get up for Sunday morn worship services :) [01:38] <_Q_> perhaps [01:38] <_Q_> that doesn't seem to stop them on #christian. [01:38] bitwise (bit@tahoe-d53.foothill.net) joined #apologetics. [01:39] salutations. [01:39] hmmm....i guess they are the nite owls [01:39] greeting bit [01:40] <_Q_> hey bitwise [01:40] any topics being discussed tonight? [01:40] no we just got here bit [01:40] <_Q_> not yet [01:40] <_Q_> what's on your mind, bit? [01:41] this place is usually quite at this time....are you all christians? [01:41] all two of you, that is =) [01:41] Action: roy is christian [01:41] <_Q_> once was, no longer [01:42] hmm..well then...let me ask this... [01:42] <_Q_> are you christian, bit? [01:43] Why did God create laws that could be broken (moral) and laws that could not be broken (say, gravity)? [01:43] Action: bitwise is a christian [01:44] <_Q_> laws is entirely the wrong metaphor, I'd say. [01:44] probably, what do you suggest? [01:45] <_Q_> the principles that govern the interaction of free beings don't seem analogous to those governing elementary particles. [01:46] this seems true, however, it could be said that we are governed by those principles...as in my point about gravity. [01:47] what made you forsake your christianity? [01:48] <_Q_> Those principles don't have obvious application to, say, your decision to log on IRC tonight. [01:48] if I may ask. [01:48] <_Q_> The physical principles, I mean. [01:48] <_Q_> Too many philosophical problems, chiefly the problem of evil. [01:49] Topic changed by ApoloBot!bibleman@xlab1.fiu.edu: The Home of Rational Theism [01:49] explain a little bit. [01:49] the problem of evil, that is [01:51] Action: bitwise stumbles into a lag-mire [01:51] <_Q_> The toleration of intolerable evil by an allegedly perfectly good & loving god. [01:52] <_Q_> Evils which we, lowly creatures, would not tolerate at our best. [01:52] toleration? hmm....would it be more loving to destroy evil completely...right now? [01:53] Q are you an athiest? [01:53] Action: _Q_ is a deist [01:53] explain please [01:54] <_Q_> It isn't a matter of destroying evil altogether, it's a matter of being non-arbitrary about what evils one chooses to eliminate. [01:54] <_Q_> explain deism? [01:55] yes is God perfect in diesm? or is God only a force? [01:56] <_Q_> here's a macro I prepared for #deism... [01:56] <_Q_> Deism is a belief in a loving creator, an ultimate & eternal being, who is omnipresent & omniscient but *not* omnipotent. [01:56] <_Q_> Contrary to popular Christian propaganda, ultimate reality ("god" if you prefer) as conceived by deism is not impersonal at all, merely non-omnipotent, hence non-controlling. [01:56] <_Q_> not a mere force. [01:56] <_Q_> rather perfect love & grace [01:58] if not omnipotent then how do you explain the origin of all creation? [02:01] <_Q_> omnipotence is fine "prior" (logically, at least) to creation; creation nullifies it: kenosis. [02:02] Q this seems nonsensical to me ...why would and attribute of a creator be nullified by his creation (kenosis) [02:02] at creation, omnipotence was nullified? [02:03] if God is eternal then his nature must be eternal also [02:04] Silvern (mburnett@biggulp.callamer.com) joined #apologetics. [02:04] hello [02:05] If God nullified his own attribute of omnipotence knowing what would happen(omniniece) then He would be an evil God wouldnt he? [02:05] Silvern (mburnett@biggulp.callamer.com) left #apologetics. [02:05] Christ manifested a kenosis...and yet he did not loose attributes. explain why creation nullifies omnipotence... [02:06] <_Q_> I see the creator as temporal, albeit everlasting. [02:06] <_Q_> brb [02:07] hmm.. [02:07] where are you from roy? [02:08] mississippi..and yourself? [02:08] Ca. [02:11] <_Q_> why would sacrificing omnipotence affect omniscience & make god evil?? [02:13] Why would he give up His power to control the evil if he knew what would happen...why would he even create in the first place? [02:14] God does not control the evil. [02:14] Same problem exists to me...unless there is another answer [02:15] at least temporarily. Although, He has the power to. [02:16] i know but Q is saying that is why he rejected Xianty...because God doesnt use his power [02:16] ah, yes... [02:16] and we Xians believe God is in control...there are no accidents [02:16] <_Q_> creation is out of love. [02:16] so is freewill [02:16] Q ...do you have children? [02:16] thus, evil [02:16] <_Q_> Freedom is all-or-nothing; real or illusion; there cannot be control and be freedom of creatures. [02:16] <_Q_> However, the xian god allegeedly retains the controlling power but uses it selectively & arbitrarily. [02:16] Action: _Q_ has not reproduced [02:16] Q an example [02:16] If you were going to have children and assuming it was planned [02:16] Do you think 10years down the road the children will commit evil..lie.cheat ect? [02:16] Wouldnt you have them anyway? [02:16] <_Q_> let me say to "we Xians believe God is in control...there are no accidents" -- this is the essence of what I reject in xianity: it is nihilistic. [02:16] explain [02:16] how nihilistic? [02:16] <_Q_> roy: re children I fail to see a real analogy there. [02:17] Action: bitwise has never heard christianity called *nihilistic* [02:17] <_Q_> nihilistic because if there is no real contingency, our actions are meaningless, predicated on illusion. [02:17] <_Q_> bit: It's about time you heard it ;-) [02:17] <_Q_> It's my principle crtiticism of not only xianity but most religions. [02:17] Q: let me try with a different twist (I don't have children) but parents have a measure of control over their children...and yet they are free to make there own choices...even if for rebilion... [02:17] <_Q_> principal, rather. [02:17] procreation of children for a purpose out of love knowing they will commit evil acts is very similar to me logically to God creating his children out of love knowing they will committ evil acts..so? [02:18] <_Q_> The difference is that we would definitely intervene in their lives to prevent intolerable evils. [02:18] so where is the problem? [02:18] <_Q_> The xian god,tho able, does not. [02:18] how so Z [02:18] Q? [02:19] we could not stop them...unless we literally bound them or incapcitated them some way. [02:19] <_Q_> As we should if necessary. [02:19] how do we intervene? [02:19] <_Q_> You must understand the magnitude of evil I'm referrring to here. [02:20] <_Q_> I'm not talking about lying! [02:20] by correction...punishment? [02:20] all evil is evil [02:20] <_Q_> Would you not do whatever was necessary to prevent, say, the holocaust? [02:20] lying is evil [02:20] <_Q_> Kill Hitler, e.g. [02:20] <_Q_> Sorry, some evil is trivial compared to others. [02:21] if God is good ..lying is against His nature..he MUST hate it...and must judge it [02:21] <_Q_> Torture vs lying: you figure it out. [02:21] Hitler was not responsible for the holocaust. [02:21] <_Q_> Judgement & wrath: other human-centered characteristics that have nothing to do with god,IMO. [02:21] would killing one person stop such evils? [02:21] <_Q_> BRB [02:23] Q what makes evil evil? [02:23] what is sin/ [02:24] roy: are there different levels of sin, as Q suggests? [02:24] Ismene (sigh@134.193.59.2) joined #apologetics. [02:24] greetings Ismene [02:24] sure but sin is sin...the nature of sin is the same...REBELLION against God [02:25] roy...si is human nature, not rebellion against some higher power. [02:25] Ismene, it is both [02:26] rebellion against higher power(God) = human nature [02:26] bitwise: no...rebellion requires a massing of forces and conflict. Sin is nayure [02:26] We have All sinned and gone astray Romans [02:27] rebels are those who trying to overthrow the kingdom of a Soviegn..hence we are rebels [02:27] I am not trying to overthorw anyone, roy. [02:27] well with such a technical definition, I might concede...none the less, the idea of his point encompasses a form of rebellion. [02:28] you do when you sin [02:28] bitwise: get out your dictionary. [02:28] <_Q_> back in 10 min. if you wish to continue the discussion... [02:29] God says do this...and say i will not have a god to rule over me...hence i WILL do as i please [02:29] Ismene: I do not wish to splice apart words...I agree with your definition...however, rebellion is often used interchangably in our culture to imply what roy is saying...such as the rebellion of a teen ager against his parents... etc. [02:29] its part of our nature to rebel..like our father the devil(unbelievers)...we are his enemies(Romans) [02:30] But the devil is...okay. Now...roy. i do not believe in such a being. [02:30] so, how can a figment of your impagination forc me to rebel? [02:31] there is no forcing, only persuasion. [02:31] a rebellion against the commands of a soveirgn power is the same as rebelling against that power itself [02:32] okay. how can a figment pursuade me if it does not exist [02:32] force...you do it freely and love it...thats the problem...IT IS part of our nature... [02:32] he could not, if he did not exist...but we contend that he does. [02:32] bitwise: yet i contend he doesn't. [02:33] i didnt say the devil made you do ...i said we are of the same nature [02:34] None of us loves God and wants to do his commandments [02:34] we are. all evil, just some of us can control it. [02:34] why did you come to this conclusion, Ismene? and, before I say anymore, I guess I should ask: do you believe in a God? (though rare, I have seen people who believe in one and not the other) [02:34] None is righteous ...NO NOT ONE..romans 3 [02:35] I believe in a God, not your version. [02:35] kcc (kcc@204.119.59.98) joined #apologetics. [02:35] hello? [02:35] Do you love God with all your heart, soul and mind Ismene? [02:35] how do you know what my *version* is? [02:35] hey kcc [02:35] Hi.. [02:35] greetings, kcc [02:35] bitwise: the christian god. [02:36] Is this a Christian room? [02:36] by the way you treat me and the questions you ask, it is my logical conclision [02:36] what does Ismenes god look like..what are his attributes? [02:36] hello [02:36] Ismene did you say you believe in the Christian God? [02:37] why isnt fellowship room open? [02:37] roy: no., [02:37] kcc: what are you looking for, friend? [02:37] bitwise: i am not that arrogant to know what my God is specifically like [02:37] what or who are you gods Ismene? [02:37] roy: they are. [02:38] sorry to bother y'all, but does anyone know why fellowship room isnt open? [02:38] are what? [02:38] Ismene: I did not mean it that way at all...I merely was trying to get a grasp on your previous statement about him being *different* than the christian God... [02:38] explain please [02:39] kcc the channel #fellowship? [02:39] I see the christian god as boxy, and therefore my god/s are de-boxed [02:39] so you make your own god up that you like? [02:40] bye all.. [02:40] see ya kcc [02:40] kcc (kcc@204.119.59.98) left #apologetics. [02:40] roy: not that [02:40] How does that solve the matter of your sin Ismene? [02:40] your sin must be dealt with [02:40] you do sin dont you? [02:41] roy: no i am infallable [02:41] kidding [02:42] so what about your sin then? [02:42] Action: bitwise notices that this was Ismene's mistake...thus his infallibility exposed =) [02:42] Okay...bitwise. note the "kidding" after it. [02:42] what will your god/gods do about your sin? [02:42] And, bitwise, you need to brush up on your Sophocles [02:42] and note the smile following mine =) [02:43] roy: it is not what they do about it that is important, it is what i do about it. [02:43] kcc (kcc@204.119.59.98) joined #apologetics. [02:44] re kcc [02:44] something happened [02:44] You see Ismene THAT is the problem with your paradigm what CAN you do about it? [02:44] what kcc? [02:44] roy: i can improve myself, learn from what i did, and change for the better [02:44] I was given +v then It was taken away and then no one answered me.. [02:44] What about the sins you have already committed? [02:44] roy: what do you mean? [02:44] What can YOU do about those? [02:44] the person took it away from the other person in that room.. [02:44] no one was able to talk.. [02:45] kcc, there is no one on #fellowship tonight. Did you try and msg LadyCarol...she may be away from her computer? [02:46] Ismene the God of the Bible is unlike any god ...no only is He Good and Loving..but foremost He is Holy...sin must be judged [02:46] roy: how can he judge who is eveil and good when he himself has commited evil. [02:46] Ladycarol is the one that gave me +V and then we both lost it.. [02:47] he who is fallable [02:47] if evil makes anysence in this world its only in the christian paradigm..Evil will be judged..every bit of it by a Holy Judge [02:47] roy: that is sheer arrogance [02:47] explain Ismene [02:47] Ismene: explain your comment about God committing evil... [02:47] explain what? [02:48] God committing evil [02:48] well, he did. [02:48] Has God ever lied? [02:48] he brought evil into the world. [02:48] how? [02:48] kcc: he let it happen. [02:49] Topic changed by ApoloBot!bibleman@xlab1.fiu.edu: The Home of Rational Theism [02:49] Ismene show me evidene [02:49] evidence [02:49] how do you know? [02:49] he is omniopotent right? [02:49] What is your scource? [02:50] Action: _Q_ has returned to join forces with Ismene [02:50] yes he is omnipotent [02:50] so? [02:50] Q? [02:50] thanks. [02:50] OKay...now if he is omniopotent, than he has a lot of power right? [02:50] welcome back Q [02:51] yes all powerful [02:51] <_Q_> christians are far too fixated on judgement, IMO. [02:51] so? [02:51] does he know everything. [02:51] kcc (kcc@204.119.59.98) left #apologetics. [02:51] Q you were the fixated on evil and how its not being judged:) [02:51] sure [02:52] knoble (knoble@acca.NMSU.Edu) joined #apologetics. [02:52] Nick change: knoble -> Fermat [02:52] hi [02:52] <_Q_> stopped, not judged. [02:52] I must agree with you Q on that one. However, the reasons should seem clear. [02:52] <_Q_> I'm not interested in punishment, but in doing or permitting no harm. [02:53] bitwise: sheer arrogance? [02:53] <_Q_> yes, all to clear. [02:53] <_Q_> too [02:53] Wolfman (ss@remote201.compusmart.ab.ca) joined #Apologetics. [02:53] merely stopping it?...why not judge Hitler for his deeds as well as stopping Him [02:54] Ismene: no, not at all. [02:54] Fermat (knoble@acca.NMSU.Edu) left #apologetics. [02:54] ...just a bit? [02:54] greetings Fermat [02:54] If God is Holy and evil is bad...evil must be judged [02:54] roy: okay, so a God who knows everything knows evil is going to be brought into the world, and lets it happen. No points for cruelty. [02:54] <_Q_> roy: what about grace & forgiveness? [02:54] im sure your not Q [02:54] <_Q_> grace is infinite. [02:54] Q this lets you off the hook for all the evil you do [02:54] greetings, Wolfman [02:54] Do you do evil Q? [02:54] Why do you do it? [02:54] <_Q_> the creator is not concernec with meting out "just deserts." [02:54] Why doesnt your god stop you? [02:54] but be sure God Will judge you for it [02:54] <_Q_> roy: precisely! that is the gospel of grace - we are all let off the hook!! [02:55] <_Q_> my "god" sacrificed control so that there might be love. [02:55] thats right .."the fool says in his heart no God" [02:55] <_Q_> in doing so all manner of evil is risked. [02:55] you God is evil to do that [02:55] <_Q_> It gets down to the ultimate question: is it all worth it? [02:56] and he is not Holy..without sin..if he will not judge it [02:56] If he is righteous he will judge all sin [02:56] Q: do you believe in an afterlife...heaven/hell? [02:56] question is Q you still have the same problem of an "evil" god [02:57] <_Q_> roy: now, like all true xians, you've brought out th ebg guns - threatening me with judgement [02:57] an evil weak god who is not good or holy and apparently doesnt care about the problem of evil [02:57] <_Q_> Afterlife, yes, hell no - it is an abominable doctrine. [02:57] ......Jesus Christ!...I go take a piss and you guys flipped three screens on me.....must be a heavey convo. [02:57] <_Q_> The worst thing xianity gave to the world. [02:58] A Good god= judgement [02:58] okay...do you believe it will be without pain, suffering, sin? [02:58] evil god could care less [02:58] Q: agreed [02:59] <_Q_> love = grace = forgiveness, as in the parables, e.g. the prodigal son. [02:59] Q what about the problem of your evil? [02:59] <_Q_> I don't even understand what you said about an "evil weak god" earlier. [03:00] ....My god is like the size of my bank account....seldom talked about......with a rteturn on interest that can barely keep up with inflation. [03:00] <_Q_> Is my god evil in your eyes? [03:00] scroll back Q [03:00] God can forgive...but he does not "force" change...this is where we need to choose...and thus forgiveness completes the circle. [03:00] yes evil weak and could care a less about evil [03:01] .....anyone here know the latest count on the number of gods in the world.? [03:01] <_Q_> scrolled back... nope - can't see the evil [03:01] roy: evil is weak? [03:01] Wolfman scores two points for a sense of humor... [03:01] <_Q_> wolfman: too many to keep track of ;-) [03:01] Imene a unominipotent god is weak [03:02] <_Q_> the creator has all the power it is logically possible for a good being to hae. [03:02] ......unominipotent?...hmmmmm.... [03:02] Q what about the evil in your world? [03:02] <_Q_> have. [03:02] roy: than does your God qualify as such? [03:02] yes ismene [03:03] <_Q_> roy: evil is the inevitable consequence of a multiplicity of free beings - I already said that. [03:03] Only christainity has the answer to sin [03:03] and evil [03:03] roy: so your god isn't omniopotent? [03:03] Action: _Q_ must briefly adjourn to prepare a steaming cup of caffeinated elixer [03:04] evil is only biological nuerons firing in the brain Q? [03:04] ....does god play dice with the universe?....could it all be one big random cosmic swirl of matter and gas?....or...was Einstein correct? [03:04] Ismene He is omnipotent..but He cant do everything [03:05] Roy...your wrong!.....the Catholics are the only ones that can eleviate sin. [03:05] roy: if he can't do everything, then he is powerless. [03:05] <_Q_> roy: " evil is only biological nuerons firing in the brain, Q?" - we are really on different wavelengths; I don't know where you get these impressions of what I'm saying. [03:05] He cant do anything against illogical or against is own will [03:05] and nature [03:05] <_Q_> " Only christainity has the answer to sin and evil [03:06] <_Q_> sorry [03:06] roy: well, those two are seperate. [03:06] <_Q_> slip of the mouse [03:06] Roy!...your wrong...the Buddhists are the only ones that can eleviate sin. [03:06] He CANT make a circle into a square ..this would be irrational and illogical [03:06] roy: to your mind [03:06] Fermat (knoble@acca.NMSU.Edu) joined #apologetics. [03:06] Roy!...your wrong!...the Hindus are the only ones that cn forgive sin. [03:06] roy: but how can you know what a God thinks? [03:06] <_Q_> "Only christainity has the answer to sin" - its answer is to torture ppl forever! [03:06] where is buddha wolf? [03:06] Fermat (knoble@acca.NMSU.Edu) left #apologetics. [03:07] explain torture Q [03:07] <_Q_> Wolfman: there are dice all over the place! [03:07] God cannot lie [03:07] ...Buddha sits across the aisle from your god in the cosmic bus. [03:07] <_Q_> roy: eternal damnation, hell - that's torture by a vindictive "holy" being. [03:07] what is hell all about to you Q? [03:08] <_Q_> wolfman: thanks for injecting a bit of levity ;-) [03:08] blessings to you ppls...I hope we will get a chance to discuss some more. [03:08] bitwise (bit@tahoe-d53.foothill.net) left #apologetics. [03:08] ....peace be with you bitwise. [03:08] i thought you were concerned about the evil in the world Q [03:09] <_Q_> yes, roy, what about it? [03:09] ....there is evil in the world? [03:09] roy: concern for the world has little to do with what religion you are [03:10] Q perhaps God is mad at the evil too [03:10] ......BINGO!...well said Ismene! [03:10] Wolf: thanks :) [03:10] <_Q_> roy: hell is insane, it is everlasting torture, you know that good & well from the bible & traditio. [03:11] insane ..how so Q? [03:11] why is eternal punishment insane? [03:11] <_Q_> if god is perfect, passions & anger do not override its good purposes. [03:11] explain [03:11] <_Q_> good grief! [03:11] roy: because what can one man do that is so evil that is desevers eternal punishmnt? [03:12] Good purposes..what good purposes can evil have? [03:12] <_Q_> I can't "explain" to someone why eternal punishment is insane! [03:12] <_Q_> if you don't see that, you're in another world. [03:12] IF God is perfect then he must by nature hate all evil [03:12] roy: byt its not. [03:12] <_Q_> who said evil has "good purposes"? [03:12] but, even [03:13] if you cant explain then perhaps there is no evidence for your statement [03:13] you did Q [03:14] anger overide his good purposes [03:14] <_Q_> fine, as you wish, go on believing in perfectly reasonable eternal punishment. [03:14] Ismene...i would rather follow someone with half a wit and a truckfull of common sense to eleviate evil from this world....than some half-baked brain washed "holier than thou" hypocritical soot hsayer......I am sure you would agree. [03:15] ....anyone here study Plato?.. [03:17] _Q_ (serenity@slip170.UCS.ORST.EDU) got netsplit. [03:17] W (cservice@undernet.org) got netsplit. [03:17] roy (roy@205.218.167.65) got netsplit. [03:17] Ismene (sigh@134.193.59.2) got netsplit. [ref002]Return to #apologetics Home Page [ref003]Return to LOGS Page [ref004]Go to the MCU Virtual Library [ref001] http://mcu.edu/library/logs/log_4_21_96.html [ref002] http://www.fiu.edu/~wgreen01/apologetics.html [ref003] http://www.fiu.edu/~wgreen01/logs.html [ref004] ../

---

The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.

Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.

E-Mail Fredric L. Rice / The Skeptic Tank