(word processor parameters LM8, RM75, TM2, BM2) Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501 Spo

(word processor parameters LM=8, RM=75, TM=2, BM=2) Taken from KeelyNet BBS (214) 324-3501 Sponsored by Vangard Sciences PO BOX 1031 Mesquite, TX 75150 There are ABSOLUTELY NO RESTRICTIONS on duplicating, publishing or distributing the files on KeelyNet! November 25, 1990 AGE3.ASC -------------------------------------------------------------------- Aging - Before and After the Flood by Jerry W. Decker Sysop/KeelyNet with notes from David Fasolds' "The Ark of Noah" (now out in paperbook) What happened to Man to cause the relatively sudden loss of longevity? Why did this occur as is most forcefully pointed out before, during and after the Great Flood? A chart of our ancestors drawn up by David Fasold follows to show the decline of longevity. Here is a list showing the decline in longevity from pre-Flood patriarchs through the post-Flood generation, finally reaching the life expectancy of today. The tradition of longevity in ancient man is recorded by the following historians: Manetho, Berosus, Mochus, Hestiaeus, Hieronymus, Hesiod, Hecataeus, Hellanicus, Acusilaus, Ephorus, Nicolaus, and Josephus. Pre-Flood (numbers = age) * Adam..............................930 * Seth..............................912 * Enos..............................905 * Kenan.............................910 * Mahaleel..........................895 * Jared.............................862 * Methuselah........................969 * Lamech............................777 * Noah..............................950 Page 1 Post-Flood Shem..............................602 * Arphaxad..........................438 * Salah.............................433 * Eber..............................464 * Peleg.............................239 * Reu...............................239 * Serug.............................230 * Nahor.............................148 * Terah.............................205 * Abraham...........................175 * Isaac.............................180 * Jacob.............................147 * Job...............................140 * Levi..............................137 * Kohath............................133 * Amaram............................137 * Moses.............................120 * Joshua............................110 * Eli................................98 * David..............................70 * Now, there are Biblical and Sumerian references to conditions before and after the Flood. The most interesting is the simple statement that the night sky was blue and WITHOUT STARS BEFORE THE FLOOD. After the Flood, the night sky WAS BLACK AND HAD STARS. Another interesting point I have heard of but have no reference for, is that RAIN was UNKNOWN to pre-Flood man. If the night sky was in fact blue before the Flood, then it must have contained a very heavy vapor or a WATER JACKET which floated in the upper atmosphere. In that case, the water would serve as a diffusion medium for any incoming light. This would then show as a blue sky with NO STARS OR HEAVENLY BODIES VISIBLE. This would also mean a considerable amount of dry land area since the displaced water must leave some land available. When the water dumped on the Earth in the form of the Flood, it had to recede eventually and that is where the low lying land masses must have become lakes and oceans. Does this mean that Astronomical observations did not occur BEFORE the Flood? How could they if the Water Jacket premise is true? That is the main flaw I see in this Water Jacket business. There are many ancient texts which show the planets and stars. Either these texts survived the Flood or the event was so old as to precede the civilizations who left the records. That is a distinct possibility. Now we get to the good stuff. It seems that we have several factors which can play a part in aging and the loss of longevity. Page 2 One is the Deuterium Oxide factor which was detailed in the Plenum newsletter and has yet to be listed on the Keelynet. That could cause suppression of the biological transmutation process to the point of aiding if not causing a radical decrease in longevity. Another is the slow compression of the DNA helices to reduce the number of base pairs per turn. This in turn would reduce the amount of electrical activity available for transcription and the replication of perfect copies with the optimum pattern. (detailed in DNAMAST1 and DNAMAST2 on KeelyNet) And now we find yet another fascinating part of the puzzle. Living tissue is most susceptible to a wavelength of 260 NM. It just so happens that is one of the frequencies of UltraViolet light which is most strongly absorbed by our atmosphere. Now ALL of it is not absorbed, just a good portion, and a great part of this is absorbed by WATER MOLECULES! We are still subject to this UV frequency when we step outside. The Ozone layer is one of the principal shielding mechanisms for this frequency as well as other harmful UV radiations. Ok, so what does all this mean? If the earth was at one time covered by a water jacket either in the form of a thick vapor or an actual shell of water, then all incoming visible and invisible rays would be subject to refraction and diffusion by passing through the water. When the water was dumped via rain onto the planet, the atmosphere was all that was left to protect us from these harmful and highly deleterious radiations. Ozone is present in a quantity of 10 parts Ozone to 1,000,000 parts of air. Without the absorption of the UV rays by the Ozone layer, life could not exist EXCEPT IN THE OCEAN thanks to the SHIELDING EFFECTS OF WATER. Ozone is formed when oxygen (O2 = molecular oxygen) is struck by sunlight carrying UV radiation which ionizes the air (strips it to atomic oxygen = O1). These free floating ("free radicals") atoms of oxygen rapidly join with other more stable molecules. In the case of O2, it then converts to O3. Ozone can have as many extra oxygen atoms as it wants, 3 is not the limit. DNA, the genetic material which guides the form and evolution of all life, is particularly susceptible to the action of UV over its entire frequency band. But as mentioned before, the wavelength of 260 NM is the MOST DESTRUCTIVE. The biological activity of the DNA is inhibited or warped from the intended pattern when exposed to UV in high doses. This leads to cell death due to incorrect copying, or mutations in the form of cancer or other diseases. In addition to DNA damage, excessive levels can cause damage to the eye leading to blindness, major sunburn, skin cancer and a host of other problems. Page 3 UltraViolet radiations are also known to INHIBIT PHOTO-SYNTHESIS thus paving the way for the destruction of plant life on this planet. Bodily defense mechanisms have been built up over millenia to accomodate to current levels of UV exposure. If UV levels continue to rise, our bodies will not be able to adapt fast enough which will cause highly accelerated aging and the promulgation of disease in living organisms. Defense mechanisms which the body would naturally use to protect itself from excessive cell damaging UV radiations include ; 1) screening of the DNA molecule with less critical molecules, 2) enzymatic mechanisms which kick in at night to repair damage done during daylight hours, 3) and the delay of cell division until nighttime when the UV radiations are weakest and therefore less damaging. These mechanisms become dominant over several generations. Aging is something we want to address now, not wait for our great-great grandchildren. This latest in a series of aging studies shows yet another factor to consider when working on disease control and longevity. How can we protect ourselves from this harmful UV radiation? We could increase the ozone layer by high voltage discharges in the upper stratosphere or by projecting ionizing beams (such as UV lasers) into the upper air. Not to mention reduced pollution to allow the natural restoration of the layer. We could somehow replace the water layer in the upper air. Since gravity weakens with the square of the distance, the water might stay suspended either as vapor or as fluid. The pre-Flood shield could then be replaced to provide protection over the entirety of the planet. We could devise a means of magnetically, electrically or sonically stimulating energetic DNA replications. This would best be done at night when the UV radiations were at a minimum. Replications could then be optimized with the minimum distortion. There are reports of meditative techniques which require imagery to allow conscious contact and influence of the cells to "dissolve" or "erase" stresses which might further impair replications. The major concern in the use of any articificial field applied to the body is that of the rupturing of the hydrogen bonds which hold the amino acids in the correct place and orientation in the double helix of the DNA. It takes only a tiny bit of energy to cause these hydrogen bonds to pop off. Page 4 Personally, I think future science will rely H E A V I L Y on phase conjugate principles and naturally generated fields of very low power amplitudes. We have information which shows that a pulsing high density magnetic field with an extremely small voltage will assist the replication process at a frequency ranging from 1.8 MHZ to about 2 MHZ. A Thermionic process using the Seebeck effect has proven to be the most effective technique yet devised. Experimentation in this area requires a thorough knowledge of the DNA/RNA structures as well as biology, physics and electronics. Interference patterns have also been generated capable of duplicating three dimensional objects or complex signatures. Through the proper use of the principles of resonance, kindling and entrainment, we will arrive at methods which will allow linking, coercion and restructuring of one type of organ or tissue to another. I believe these principles will also prove to be the primary building blocks for the discovery of anti-grav, free energy, rejuvenation and disease eradication. Thank you for your interest, patience and support. -------------------------------------------------------------------- If you have comments or other information relating to such topics as this paper covers, please upload to KeelyNet or send to the Vangard Sciences address as listed on the first page. Thank you for your consideration, interest and support. Jerry W. Decker.........Ron Barker...........Chuck Henderson Vangard Sciences/KeelyNet -------------------------------------------------------------------- If we can be of service, you may contact Jerry at (214) 324-8741 or Ron at (214) 242-9346 -------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 5