By: J.J. Hitt
To: David Dahl
Re: Boylan - Cover Letter
BEFORE THE
BOARD OF PSYCHOLOGY
DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of the Accusation)
Against: )
)
Richard J. Boylan, Ph.D )
License No. PSY-10047 ) No. W-14
) N--9404129
)
)
Respondent )
-------------------------------)
DECISION
--------
The Board of Psychology hereby adopts the attached Proposed
Decision as its own decision in the above-referenced matter.
This Decision is effective as of August 4, 1995.
---------------
IT IS SO ORDERED August 4,1995.
--------------
By: [Signature appears on document]
-------------------------------
Judith Janaro Fabian, Ph.D.
Vice-Chairperson
Board of Psychology
ooOOoo
--- Msgedsq 2.2e
* Origin: My Pal Foot Foot (Houston) (1:106/9788.2)
SEEN-BY: 102/2 138 435 752 837 890 943 1013 147/7 270/101 280/1 9
25 26 31 45
SEEN-BY: 280/115 135 333 378 396/1
@PATH: 30873/2 106/9788 888 449 2000 270/101 280/1 102/2 752 943
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(1441) Wed 11 Oct 95 4:23
By: J.J. Hitt
To: David Dahl
Re: Boylan - Pages 1 & 2
----------------------------------------------------------------------
@EID:4d09 1f4b22e0
@MSGID: 1:106/9788.2 5b929d89
@REPLY: 1:272/85.666 cc2ddbe3
BEFORE THE
MEDICAL BOARD OF CALIFORNIA
BOARD OF PSYCHOLOGY
AND THE BOARD OF BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE EXAMINERS
DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of the Accusation )
Against: )
)
RICHARD J. BOYLAN, Ph.D. ) No. W-14 and
2826 O Street, Suite 2 ) LMS-57
Sacramento, CA 958116 )
)
Psychologist's License ) OAH Mos. N-9404129
No. PSY-10047 ) N-9406179
)
MFCC License No. MFC 5943 )
LCSW License No. 4231 )
)
)
Respondent. )
---------------------------------------
PROPOSED DECISION
-----------------
On October 24-28, November 2, 15, 16, 18 and 22,
December 6, 27 and 30, 1994, and January 11-13, 117, 18 and 31,
February 1 and 16, and March 1, 1995, in Sacramento, California,
Muriel Evens, Administrative Law Judge, Office of Administrative
Hearings, State of California, heard this matter.
Robert Miller and Arthur Taggart, Deputies Attorney
General, represented the complainants
Matheny, Poidmore, Linkert & Sears and Richard S.
Linkert represented respondent.
Evidence was received, the record was closed July 20,
1995, and the matter was submitted.
(page) 1
FINDINGS OF FACTS
-----------------
I
Complainants Thomas S. O'Connor, Executive Office of
the Board of Psychology, and Scott C. Syphax, Interim Executive
Office of the Board of Behavioral Science Examiners, made and
files the Accusations in these matters in their official
capacities and not otherwise.
II
On July 16,1987, the Board of Psychology issued
license number PSY 10047 to respondent Richard J. Boylan.
On October 30, 1972, the Board of Behavioral Science
Examiners (BBSE) issued marriage, family and child counselor
license number MFC 5943 to respondent.
On March 2, 1974, the BBSE issued licensed clinical
social worker license number LCS 4231 to respondent.
At all relevant times, respondent was engaged in the
private practice of psychology.
III
D.W.
----
Respondent treated D.W., a female, from approximately
December 1991 to February 1993. She was referred to respondent
by a fellow member of the Incest Survivors Anonymous (ISA)
support group she had been attending. D.W. had been involved
with ISA for about one year before meeting respondent. She
continued with ISA, including a subgroup Nothing Too Heavy to
Share,through the Fall 1992. D.W. was 28 years old and an
unemployed single mother seeking a therapist who would accept
Medi-Cal. Respondent agreed to accept her as a Medi-Cal patient.
D.W. presented as a recovering alcoholic with three
years of sobriety, and adult child of alcoholic parents, a former
abuser of cannabis and methamphetamines and an incest victim.
Respondent's initial diagnosis was:
Axis I: Post traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD);
Dissociative Disorder NOS;
Depressive Disorder NOS;
Alcohol Dependence, in remission;
(page) 2
ooOOoo
--- Msgedsq 2.2e
* Origin: My Pal Foot Foot (Houston) (1:106/9788.2)
SEEN-BY: 102/2 138 435 752 837 890 943 1013 147/7 270/101 280/1 9
25 26 31 45
SEEN-BY: 280/115 135 333 378 396/1
@PATH: 30873/2 106/9788 888 449 2000 270/101 280/1 102/2 752 943
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(1442) Wed 11 Oct 95 4:24
By: J.J. Hitt
To: David Dahl
Re: Boylan - Pages 3 & 4
----------------------------------------------------------------------
@EID:8ff0 1f4b2300
@MSGID: 1:106/9788.2 5b929ef2
@REPLY: 1:272/85.666 cc2ddbe3
Methamphetamine abuse in remission
Cannabis Dependence in remission
Respondent's plan was to meet weekly or biweekly, as insurance
permitted, for treatment of depression and traumatic sexual abuse
and to improve self esteem and personal skills.
Although initially D.W. was reluctant to try hypnosis,
respondent encouraged her to do so to retrieve memories of abuse.
During their fifth session, on January 7, 1992, respondent
performed D.W.'s first "memory enhancement hypnosis." They
covered sexual abuse at age four by D.W.'s mother and at age four
to five by her father. Other sessions involving hypnosis followed
on occasion, with further recall of childhood sexual abuse and
possible ritualistic abuse.
In late winter or early spring of 1992, D.W.
listened to a radio talk show about abductions by aliens and the
use of hypnosis. At a therapy session, D.W. asked respondent
somewhat flippantly if he thought these people may have been
abused and confused about the memory. Respondent, with a serious
face, responded that he thought it might be just the opposite.
In the same session, respondent said that he had some patients
who may have had extraterrestrial (ET) experiences and he was
doing some research on the subject.
At the next session, D.W. brought up the ET issue and
respondent showed D.W. a book entitled ENCOUNTERS, by Edith
Fiori. Soon after that, respondent told D.W. that he was going
on a week-long tour of sites of alleged ET activity. According
to D.W. (R.T. 10/24/94, 28:8-17):
"Q What was your reaction to the doctor's
discussion with you about this tour of
extraterrestrial sites?
"A I felt really nervous for him. I was
kind of confused at the time. I was
starting to believe that maybe he was --
this was something real. And I was
nervous for him, and I told him to be
careful.
"Q Be careful? What did you mean by that?
"A Well, specifically, he said he was going
to some very top secret military places.
And I was concerned about what might
happen to him."
(page) 3
Respondent had spoken to D.W about a secret government cover-up
and involvement of the U.S. military. Respondent told D.W. the
sites were connected to government operations involving the
flying of ET aircraft, recovered ET aircraft and the building of
aircraft using technology learned from ET sources. From what
respondent had told her, D.W. feared that on his trip respondent
might be abducted by ETs.
In or about a June 1992, session, D.W. brought out
having daydream-type image or fleeting memory from childhood of
a strange-looking man, who may have been a molester. Respondent
asked D.W. to describe what he looked like and his height,
including his height in relationship to her as a child.
The image was not clear to D.W., but she recalled he was not tall
and had sharp features and narrow eyes. Respondent then asked
D.W. to draw the man, which she did. After that and the
conversation set forth below, D.W. had the impression that
respondent thought her image was of an extraterrestrial.
"Q Can you describe when that occurred to
you and why? And why you got that
impression in your mind that's what you
were being asked to describe?
"A [Respondent] asked me to stand up, and
he had some sort of tape measure he was
holding up. And I stood up, and he was
holding -- well, let's see. And he said
something like 4 foot or 4-foot
something. That's about -- well, it
could be a little taller. That's about
right.
"Administrative Law Judge: He said or you said?
"A He said this. It was kind of under his
breath.That's when it occurred to me
that's maybe what he was thinking that
this might be." (R.T 10/24/94 43:9-
20.)
The session continued with hypnosis. While under hypnosis,
respondent further inquired whether D.W. could describe in more
detail the appearance of the man in her image. Then, toward the
end, she "started getting an image of that like an
extraterrestrial face and this really bright light, being
surrounded by a bright light right at the end." (R.T. 10/24/94
47:11-14.) According to D.W., as she came out of hypnosis:
"Dr. Boylan was smiling; he was leaning back
in his chair and smiling. And I remember
feeling really weird. ... I was really
(page) 4
ooOOoo
--- Msgedsq 2.2e
* Origin: My Pal Foot Foot (Houston) (1:106/9788.2)
SEEN-BY: 102/2 138 435 752 837 890 943 1013 147/7 270/101 280/1 9
25 26 31 45
SEEN-BY: 280/115 135 333 378 396/1
@PATH: 30873/2 106/9788 888 449 2000 270/101 280/1 102/2 752 943
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(1443) Wed 11 Oct 95 4:24
By: J.J. Hitt
To: David Dahl
Re: Boylan - Pages 5 & 6
----------------------------------------------------------------------
@EID:4ef9 1f4b2300
@MSGID: 1:106/9788.2 5b92a056
@REPLY: 1:272/85.666 cc2ddbe3
confused and scared. And I was kind of angry
at Dr. Boylan for smiling because I was
feeling how I was. (R.T. 10/24/94 48:2-8.)
In June, respondent advised D.W. that he was starting a
support group (CE-IV)[1] at his home for people who have had
extraterrestrial experiences. He said that while he thought it
was probably premature, he thought D.W. should come to the
meeting.
Within a week or two of the therapy session, D.W.
attended the meeting at respondent's home. About ten people
attended and D.W. recognized one from the ISA group. During this
meeting respondent played an audio tape by James Harter,
explaining his views on extraterrestrials, what they are like,
who is likely to be abducted and so on.
D.W. continued to attend the CE-IV group meeting about
every three weeks and continued with her therapy with respondent,
until early 1993. After a few months of attending CE-IV
meetings, D.W. brought to therapy a nightmare she had had since
childhood. The dream involved floating down a hallway to the
foyer and then seeing a monster. At the CE-IV meetings she had
heard of similar occurrences among persons who had had ET
contact. Under hypnosis, her dream continued.
"Then the monster became like an E.T., and then there
were other extraterrestrials. And then I was, like,
walked out of my home where I saw some bright lights
out on the front lawn." (R.T. 10.24/94 70:9-13.)
From the time of this hypnosis, D.W. began to identify
more with the CE-IV group and feel that she might have had an ET
experience. Notes from her therapy sessions show increased ET
references, along with continued references to ritualistic abuse.
During the Fall of 1992, respondent told the CE-IV group
of a UFO/ET conference in Las Vegas from Saturday, November 29
through Tuesday, December 2, 1992. Respondent would be
presenting information from his research and experiences and
invited others to attend. Because of the expense and other
reasons, none of the CE-IV group planned to attend. As the
conference neared, respondent told the group that others
interested in presenting their experiences could have their way
paid to the conference. D.W., R.R. and R.W. signed on to go to
the conference to share their experiences.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-----
[1] CE-IV refers to close encounters of the fourth kind, or those
involving abductions by aliens.
(page) 5
Before going to the conference, respondent had members
of the support group draw "visual representations." D.W.
participated, drawing a figure, which was to be from her
experience. the last therapy session before the conference,
respondent told D.W. that she would be able to go, expenses paid
by the conference organizer. Respondent set up a meeting at his
house one evening about a week before the departure for the four
area participants to plan their trip. Respondent said that part
of the meeting would be in the hot tub and that no suits were
allowed. Respondent did not allow bathing suits in his hot tub
because he believed residual detergent in the suits left "soap
scum" in the tub.
D.W. went to respondent's house and was the first to
arrive. Respondent and his wife were there, R.R. and R.W. then
arrived. The others adjourned to the backyard while D.W. hid in
the bathroom, afraid to be naked in front of the others and
afraid to see everyone else. She was terrified and embarrassed.
After the other four were in the hot tub, D.W. wrapped in a
towel, went out to the tub and jumped in. They discussed plans
for the trip. Following the meeting, D.W. went back to the house,
got dressed and left. D.W. did not want to be nude around
others, she was uncomfortable with her own body and embarrassed.
The four flew from Sacramento to Las Vegas and rented a
car. The two women, R.R. and D.W., shared a hotel room. The two
men, respondent and R.W., shared another room. The group
attended and/or participated in a number of the sessions. On
Monday, the four planned a trip to Area 51, a large military area
in Nevada where ET activity is alleged to take place. R.R.
became ill and unable to go along. R.W. decided to stay in Las
Vegas with R.R. At about 4:00 p.m., respondent and D.W. set out
in a rental car for Area 51. Unfortunately, due to a
navigational error. the two ended up circumnavigating the area
and returning about 2:30 in the morning.
Upon their return to the hotel, D.W. went to her room
and found both R.R and R.W. asleep, although in separate beds.
She told respondent. who was in the hall, that the two were in
the room. She then went to respondent's room. They were both
tired and respondent was due to speak that morning. D.W.
undressed and went to one of the beds in the respondent's room;
he went to the other bed. After the lights were out, D.W. began
moaning in pain, apparently some form of gastric distress as a
result of fast food eaten on the Area 51 drive. Respondent
offered to give her a massage to help relieve the pains. Both
D.W. and respondent were nude, although respondent was covered by
the sheet. As D.W. came over to the respondent's bed, she
stated she
did not want any sexual relationship. Respondent advised her
that he did not want one because he did not want to risk his
license, his marriage or his therapeutic relationship with D.W.
He then gave her an abdominal message. Afterward, he turned over
(page) 6
ooOOoo
--- Msgedsq 2.2e
* Origin: My Pal Foot Foot (Houston) (1:106/9788.2)
SEEN-BY: 102/2 138 435 752 837 890 943 1013 147/7 270/101 280/1 9
25 26 31 45
SEEN-BY: 280/115 135 333 378 396/1
@PATH: 30873/2 106/9788 888 449 2000 270/101 280/1 102/2 752 943
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(1444) Wed 11 Oct 95 4:25
By: J.J. Hitt
To: David Dahl
Re: Boylan - Pages 7 & 8
----------------------------------------------------------------------
@EID:4a01 1f4b2320
@MSGID: 1:106/9788.2 5b92a2d2
@REPLY: 1:272/85.666 cc2ddbe3
and went to sleep, expecting D.W. to return to her bed. She did
not and slept in next to respondent until the alarm went off at
6:00 a.m.
At some point in the Fall of 1992, respondent and the
CE-IV group decided to write a book about their experiences.
Respondent and his wife were to be the editors and respondent
would include his research. The group members would provide
individual chapters on their experiences. D.W. had drafted her
chapter and rewritten it following her submittal to respondent's
wife for editing. Respondent returned a corrected version of her
chapter to her at a therapy session in or about late January
1993. There was no written agreement between respondent and D.W.
regarding any royalties or profits from the publication of the
book. There was no written notice or agreement between
respondent and D.W. regarding any research he was conducting of
which she was part.
In February 1993, D.W. discontinued therapy with
respondent and ceased her participation in the CE-IV group. She
did not submit a final version of her book chapter. The book was
published and her work was not included.
On February 16, 1993, D.W. respondent's termination
diagnosis of D.W. was:
Axis I: Factitous Disorder with Psychological
Symptoms
Axis II: Personality Disorder NOS (Addiction to Victim
Status Syndrome)
Passive-Aggressive Personality Disorder.
IV
K.G.
----
Respondent treated K.G., a female, from approximately
September 16, 1991 until mid-June 1992. She presented, at age
32, with a history of childhood physical and sexual abuse,
alcohol and cannabis abuse, extreme anxiety and asthma. Her
mother is an alcoholic and Vallium abuser and was sent to Patton
State Hospital in 1965. Her father raped her sister, who was
then 12, (K.G. was about four at the time and had flashbacks of
seeing the rape.) The children were placed in care with abusive
foster parents. As of September 1991, K.G. was employed and
"married" to Janna for seven years. K.G. had been in therapy for
10 years with a female therapist and wanted to try a male
therapist to address her prejudice against men in personal
settings.
(page) 7
Respondent's initial diagnosis:
Axis I: Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).
residual state, severe;
Alcohol Dependence, residual state;
Cannabis Dependence;
Depressive Disorder NOS
Axis II: Axis II deferred, obsessive-compulsive traits
mild
Respondent's treatment plan was "intermediate duration biweekly
psychotherapy to correct PTSD, enhance identity and intimacy
competencies."
K.G. had dropped out of graduate school in social work,
but was working for a social services agency. She is a fifth
degree black belt in a form of Karate. Her asthma could be
severe and induced by exercise or stress. Part of her past
therapy included breathwork with relaxation.
K.G. continued breathwork with respondent. On one
occasion, as part of the breathwork, he touched her abdominal
area. There was no evidence K.G. considered the touch sexual.
In early December 1991, respondent invited K.G. to a special
multi-hour session, at his house. Respondent told K.G. to bring
a towel, which she thought was for breathwork on the floor. When
she arrived at respondent's home, they went into the living room
and spoke for a while. He then mentioned the hot tub for water
therapy to relax and let go of tension. Respondent directed K.G.
to an area to undress and it became clear that the hot tubbing
would be in the nude. She was confused, but followed his
direction and met him in the backyard. Both K.G. and respondent
were wearing only a towel. Both got into the hot tub, with K.G.
taking off her towel "at the last second."
Respondent and K.G. engaged in some small talk,
According to K.G.:
"Pretty much I had just had a general increase in
anxiety and nervousness and vacillating from
questioning -- started to question, 'is this okay?'
this has never happened ore been requested by
anyone I've worked with, and I hadn't really heard of
it being done. So on the one hand, questioning the
legitimacy, and on the other hand that scaring me
because I didn't want this to not be right and me be
participating, so I would flip back into denial and
say, 'I'm sure it's okay."... I feel like I just
(page) 8
ooOOoo
--- Msgedsq 2.2e
* Origin: My Pal Foot Foot (Houston) (1:106/9788.2)
SEEN-BY: 102/2 138 435 752 837 890 943 1013 147/7 270/101 280/1 9
25 26 31 45
SEEN-BY: 280/115 135 333 378 396/1
@PATH: 30873/2 106/9788 888 449 2000 270/101 280/1 102/2 752 943
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(1445) Wed 11 Oct 95 4:26
By: J.J. Hitt
To: David Dahl
Re: Boylan - Pages 9 & 10
----------------------------------------------------------------------
@EID:aa8c 1f4b2340
@MSGID: 1:106/9788.2 5b92a501
@REPLY: 1:272/85.666 cc2ddbe3
started to separate, the way I would separate during
violent episodes in my childhood, where you just
started to go away from your body." (R.T. 11/2/94
19:22-20:5.)
Respondent did remark on K.G.'s breathing patterns and gave her
some instructions on breathing. At one point, when it had become
too hot for them to remain in the tub, they sat on the rim.
"...I remember one time taking a deep breath and kind
of stretching my hand in an upward direction, and him
saying that that was good to breath from that low, and
then once he coached me to look at his stomach while he
breathed to see how his stomach moved when he breathed
..." (R.T. 11/2/94 20:14-18.)
While in the hot tub, respondent "worked" on the upper shoulder
area, to relieve tension. He was behind respondent, at somewhat
of a 90-degree angle, so that his head was to K.G.'s side.
After perhaps "a couple of hours," they got out of the
hot tub, dried off, wrapped the towels around themselves and
returned inside. K.G. got dressed and went into the living room.
Respondent said that he didn't mean for her to get dressed yet,
so she
undressed again. She returned to the living room and found
respondent , still undressed, sitting on the floor, "Indian
style." K.G. sat across from respondent, her legs also crossed.
Respondent asked K.G. to look into his eye, with their hands
connected--her hands palm up, his palm down. After an
uncomfortably long period, perhaps three to five minutes without
any speaking, respondent burned a triangle incense and asked K.G.
if he could burn it around her. He then outlined her upper body
with the incense. After that they got up and K.G. got dressed.
When she returned to the living room, respondent had also
dressed. They say on some chairs and engaged in some "wrap-up"
conversation, such as when they would meet again. There was no
"processing" of what had happened.
On two occasions during her therapy, respondent asked
K.G. if she wanted to participate in a group trip to Harbin Hot
Springs, a nude resort. One purpose of the trip was to allow
women to improve their body image. Respondent and his wife would
attend and there would be nude bathing in the hot springs.
Respondent declined the invitations.
K.G. was seeing respondent about twice a month. WHile
they agreed that more frequent sessions would be helpful, K.G.
did not have sufficient funds to pay for the additional time. In
or about February or March 1992, respondent suggested a barter
system where he would provide therapy to K.G., K.G. would provide
karate lessons or another service to a third person, and the
third person would provide massage to respondent. K.G. knew a
(page) 9
massage therapist and contacted her about the possibility.
However, she was not interested. Respondent then suggested
Janna, but K.G. did not want to involve her. Ultimately, it was
agreed that K.G. would do the massage. Since she had no
experience in massage, she contacted her friend for a "couple of
hours" of instructions.
In an effort to comply with ethical standards,
respondent and K.G. agreed to exchange an hour of massage for an
hour of psychotherapy. Once that program was implemented, K.G.
started weekly therapy, providing massage about every other week.
At some point, respondent advised K.G. that he had been to a
conference and learned they would have to exchange money for
their services. After that, they wrote checks to each other.
Respondent came to K.G.'s home for the massage. which occurred
in the living room. Respondent preferred nude, uncovered
massage. After the massage, he would walk nude from the living
room to shower and then return to the living room to dress.
K.G. was uncomfortable with the massage and with the
nudity. She felt she was not assertive enough to say anything
and was intimidated by respondent.
"It's easier for me to be assertive with strangers, not
with people I'm connected to, let alone dependent on.
If Richard Boylan had physically attacked me, I would
have physically neutralized him. To deal with him
emotionally, I have a weakness. A physical assault
straight arm, I could handle it, I wouldn't let anyone
harm me, ...but I had a lot of issues with Richard. I
was dependent on him, I wanted his approval, and I
didn't want to believe this was betrayal." (R.T.
11/2/94 36:15-23.)
During the final session, respondent commented to K.G.
that if she happened to "graze" his testicles, it would be okay.
It was warm outside and K.G.was hot and sweating. She was
wearing jogging shorts and a tank top. Respondent suggested that
she take her shirt off if she was hot. K.G. did not do so.
Later, during that same massage session, respondent asked K.G to
work in the lower abdomen and thigh region. K.G. told respondent
that she had not been taught to work in that area and had been
taught it was inappropriate to have such contact with a client.
Respondent ridiculed K.G., indicating something to the effect
that it "sounds like a person [referring to K.G.'s trainer] who
is worried and up-tight." (R/T. 11/2/94 37:26.) Respondent
then offered to demonstrate on K.G. how he wanted the massage
done and suggested it would work better if she disrobed.
According to K.G.:
[T]hat was the light switch, two-by-four approach to
me where I thought I was going to be sick, because at
(page) 10
ooOOoo
--- Msgedsq 2.2e
* Origin: My Pal Foot Foot (Houston) (1:106/9788.2)
SEEN-BY: 102/2 138 435 752 837 890 943 1013 147/7 270/101 280/1 9
25 26 31 45
SEEN-BY: 280/115 135 333 378 396/1
@PATH: 30873/2 106/9788 888 449 2000 270/101 280/1 102/2 752 943
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(1446) Wed 11 Oct 95 4:27
By: J.J. Hitt
To: David Dahl
Re: Boylan - Pages 11 & 12
----------------------------------------------------------------------
@EID:ec79 1f4b2360
@MSGID: 1:106/9788.2 5b92a69b
@REPLY: 1:272/85.666 cc2ddbe3
that point, my denial had to stop. And I feel that if
there was a pivotal point in my relationship with Dr.
Boylan, whether it be in the therapeutic capacity or in
the body work capacity, that that was the first time I
thought that in a serious way this might not only not
be appropriate, but perhaps be sexual." (R.T. 11/2/94
38:23-39:1.)
Respondent demonstrated lightly on her stomach, through her
shirt, how he wanted to be massaged. He was very conservative.
However, when it came time for K.G. to work on respondent, she
felt ill and excused herself from the room. Ultimately she
finished the massage. She left the room when respondent wrote
the check for payment, as she did not feel comfortable being in
the same room with him.
At the following therapy session, K.G. told respondent
that she was uncomfortable and did not wish to continue with the
massage arrangement. Respondent "just said okay" and the session
proceeded. At the next therapy session, respondent related
differently to K.G. He seemed to her to be more distant, aloof.
He did not make eye contact or allow her to speak. He left the
room twice, something he had not done before, and cut off the
session 15 - 20 minutes early. K.G. was so angry about the
session that she stopped on her way home to call respondent from
a telephone booth. She told him she wanted him to stop inviting
her to Harbin Hot Springs and that she no longer felt safe with
him. She felt he was violating boundaries and she did not trust
him. She told him she was angry with how he handled the therapy
session. Respondent then called K.G. after she got home. She
restated her feelings. He raised his voice and told her she was
getting "A-1 therapy," and was just running away from therapy.
K.G. felt respondent was screaming at her. Respondent followed
up with calls to K.G. to schedule additional sessions, but she
did not return his calls.
Respondent added the following diagnosis to K.G.'s
chart:
Axis II Borderline Personality Disorder
Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder
V
D.S.
----
Respondent treated D.S. from September 1990 through
February 1993. She presented, at age 31, with spinal and other
injuries from a serious vehicle accident three years earlier,
molest by her teacher at age 13 and rape at 18, which resulted in
pregnancy. Her parents are alcoholics. She had been diagnosed
(page) 11
with Chronic Fatigue Immune Deficiency Syndrome (CFIDS), a
disease which severely limited her ability to work and function.
D.S. wanted to find some healing related to the issues of her
molest and the distance she felt from her family, the rape and
giving up the child for adoption, and the vehicle accident. She
wanted to reduce stress, to help cope with CFIDS. Respondent's
initial diagnosis of D.S. was:
Axis I: Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD),
residual state
Dipthymia, secondary, early onset
Psychological Factors Affecting Physical
Condition (Provisional)
Axis II: Dependent Personality Disorder
Axis III: Multiple Musculoskeletal traumata (by
history);neuromyelitis, infectious venulitis
and immune deficiency syndrome (by history)
Respondent's treatment plan called for biweekly sessions "to
reduce depression, resolve PTSD symptoms, reduce driving phobia,
improve self=esteem, [and] eliminate over-reliance on somatic
victimization for sense of identity."
During the early part of her therapy with respondent,
the focus was on D.S.'s emotional recovery from her accident and
her relationship with her family. At session 16, on February
21, 1991, she told respondent about a recurring dream involving
small figures which looked like monks at the end of the hall. In
the dream, she tried to turn on lights, but none worked. She got
angry because she could not see them and hit one of the "monks."
After that, they all disappeared. Then the dream would repeat.
D.S. had a second dream about a man, dressed in black, whose face
she could not see. She wrestled with him; he was trying to kill
her.
Respondent continued to treat D.S. for the issues she
presented at the beginning of her therapy. Respondent told her
she did not know boundaries, which is why she "let him (the
teacher) do it." Respondent said that in his experience, the
lack of boundaries signaled possible abuse at an early age. He
told her he thought she had been molested earlier, in addition to
age 13. He then used hypnosis to help D.S. "by recovering
repressed memories."
In the Spring 1992, respondent brought up in therapy
the subject of ETs and dwarf-like beings. D.S. reminded
respondent of her earlier dream about the monks. Respondent gave
D.S. an article from the Atlantic Monthly, August 1991, entitled
(page) 12
ooOOoo
--- Msgedsq 2.2e
* Origin: My Pal Foot Foot (Houston) (1:106/9788.2)
SEEN-BY: 102/2 138 435 752 837 890 943 1013 147/7 270/101 280/1 9
25 26 31 45
SEEN-BY: 280/115 135 333 378 396/1
@PATH: 30873/2 106/9788 888 449 2000 270/101 280/1 102/2 752 943
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(1447) Wed 11 Oct 95 4:28
By: J.J. Hitt
To: David Dahl
Re: Boylan - Pages 13 & 14
----------------------------------------------------------------------
@EID:0cf8 1f4b2380
@MSGID: 1:106/9788.2 5b92a8a3
@REPLY: 1:272/85.666 cc2ddbe3
"The UFO Experience."He asked her to read the article and see
if any of the feelings described were familiar to D.S. The ET
material frightened D.S., but also made her more curious. While
she thought of the monks as a dream, respondent told her the
"dream" was in fact a "visitation." Respondent identified the
"monks" as "Jawas," one type or race od aliens.He also showed
her photos after his return from his "grand tour" of the
Southwest military bases alleged to be involved in ET activity.
In some of those photos were drawings of aliens respondent
identified as "Grays."
Respondent told D.S. that hypnosis might help her learn
if she had been abducted by aliens. D.S. was frightened as did
not want to know of the "dream" was in fact not a dream. No
hypnosis was performed on the monk dream, but respondent brought
up the possibility again, suggesting that hypnosis might
establish what really happened.Respondent told D.S. that ETs
cloud people's minds, making them believe that what really
happened was just a dream, a pleasant experience or did not
happen at all. Respondent said the only way to find out was
through debriefing through hypnosis. While D.S. declined
hypnosis, respondent suggested she participate in his CE-IV
group, to meet with others who had had similar experiences,
processed them and found positive elements. He described the
other participants, at R.T. 11/15/94 78:17:
A "They were clients and people that came to him.
Some with ET experiences, some that found out...
that they had ET experiences after seeing him.
They were all screened do there wasn't any danger
that they were infiltrated by the government."
After rejecting several offers by respondent to attend
the CE-IV group meetings, D.S. finally agreed, because "he kept
bringing it up so I went." D.S. went to her first meeting in or
about September 1992. She arrived late and the discussion
involved Area 51, the government cover-up and how respondent's
telephone was probably tapped, now that he was coming out in
public and speaking about ETs. It was discussed that if his
phone was tapped, then it was possible that others in the group
were also being spied on. D.S. followed the suggestion of a
telephone company employee who participated in the CE-IV
meetings.When the phone rang, she would pick it up and drop it.
She also started using her answering machine to screen calls,
because she was receiving calls where the caller would not
respond and just hang up.
At the next therapy session following the CE-IV meeting, respondent
asked her
what she thought of the meeting and they discussed the phone
tapping issue and
other matters from the group. At a later group meeting, respondent
and others
discussed putting together a book to get the message out. The
Page[ 13
format would include personal stories, like an anthology. In a
following therapy session, D.S. told respondent that she did not
feel that she had anything to write. She did not feel she had
anything concrete. Respondent told her "Just write what you
have. It's enough." Both at the support and in therapy
sessions, respondent provided draft and revised copies of the
book's table of contents and his chapter on his experiences.
D.S.'s story was included in the table of contents. In therapy,
respondent discussed the benefits and risks involved in
participating in the book. Among the risks would be placing
oneself more in the public eye and "silencing by the secret
government." Respondent indicated he would be at higher risk.
D.S. believed what respondent said. At R.T. 11/15/94 109:2-8:
A "He told me that they have the ability to make a
person die very quickly looking like it was
natural causes. They have the ability to use a
little dart that doesn't leave a trace.They can
make a person die of cancer within a few weeks.
That he would probably be the target because he
was the leader."
At R.T. 109:14-16:
Q "You say you were concerned for him. Did you
express your concern?
A "I asked him to be really careful."
Also in the Fall 1992, D.S. complained to respondent about
difficulties eating
and sleeping, and ringing in her ears. She was concerned.
Respondent told her
that maybe the ETs were doing a tune-up on her.
D.S had a second dream in early1993 that she discussed with
respondent
shortly thereafter. In the dream, she woke up to a distant roar,
got out of bed and walked to the living room. There she looked up
through the atrium skylight as a pink light was coming down. She
felt joy
and thought she saw Ghandi. She then felt very peaceful and slept
well after the dream. When she woke she felt good about the dream.
Respondent suggested hypnosis to more fully explore the dream. D.S.
agreed, because the dream had been positive and she felt safe about
learning more. Respondent told D.S. that there was a strong
possibility of ET involvement.
During hypnosis, respondent took D.S. through the dream into the
atrium. At
R.T. 11/15/94 6:1:
A "...I stand under the light in the atrium and then
go up through into the sky.
page[ 14
ooOOoo
--- Msgedsq 2.2e
* Origin: My Pal Foot Foot (Houston) (1:106/9788.2)
SEEN-BY: 102/2 138 435 752 837 890 943 1013 147/7 270/101 280/1 9
25 26 31 45
SEEN-BY: 280/115 135 333 378 396/1
@PATH: 30873/2 106/9788 888 449 2000 270/101 280/1 102/2 752 943
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(1448) Wed 11 Oct 95 4:28
By: J.J. Hitt
To: David Dahl
Re: Boylan - Pages 15 & 16
----------------------------------------------------------------------
@EID:ab79 1f4b2380
@MSGID: 1:106/9788.2 5b92aa4b
@REPLY: 1:272/85.666 cc2ddbe3
Q "Was he asking you questions during the process?
A "Yes.
Q "What was he asking you?
A "'What did it look like? 'Was it a ship?' 'What
shape was it?' 'What was it made of?' 'Was it
metal?' 'What kind of metal?' 'What did they
look like?' 'Was there more than one?' 'Were you
standing on a floor?' 'Were there walls?' 'Were
there lights?' 'Were there sounds?' 'Was the
floor solid?' 'Was it metal?' 'Was it something
else?' 'Where was the light coming from?'
According to D.S., in her original dream there was no ship and
there were no
walls. What had been a comforting dream, through hypnosis turned
ugly, more
like a nightmare. At R.T. 11/15/94 70:25:
A "[T]he dream turned into being put on some kind of
a table and probed with some kind of probe that
really hurt bad, and me feeling very angry about,
'Why are you hurting me?' And that there was
something wrong with me and 'Why don't you fix
it?' and then one of the -- after this, like
escorting me back to my room and I couldn't move,
and that was it.
In addition, D.S. recalls from the hypnosis session that "They did
something.
Removed something." None of the above was in the original dream.
However, in
1991, D.S. had undergone surgery for the removal of an ovary. At
that time she was angry and scared and had a bad reaction to the
anesthesia.
After the hypnosis, respondent told D.S. that the aliens sounded
like they were "reptilians or amphibs." He asked D.S. to draw one
of them, but she unable to "put it together." Respondent then
sketched one for her, but she did not think it was correct. She
told respondent she was scared. D.S. had learned in the CE-IV
group that the ETs could return and she was afraid "they" could
come back anytime and there was nothing she could do about it. To
D.S., respondent did not seem concerned about her fear. He did not
explain how the product of this hypnosis was going to help D.S.
solve any of her
presenting problems.
About half way through her therapy with respondent he invited D.S
to spend a day at Harbin Hot Springs with him, his wife and a few
other patients. The trip would be billed as a regular therapy
session and involve certain exercises and soaking in the hot
springs in the nude. The purpose of the trip was for
page[ 15
the patients to improve self-esteem and see their bodies as good.
Respondent told D.S. the trip would help her heal by becoming
comfortable with her body and her sexuality. D.S. declined
respondent's invitation because she was not comfortable being
nude in front of people she did not know. Respondent repeated the
invitation a few times, and each time D.S. declined. After a break
of a few months, respondent indicated that there would be a second
date scheduled for the trip. He again invited D.S. and she
accepted the invitation because she wanted to heal, but felt
stressed and anxious. The night before the trip, D.S. left a
message for respondent that she could not go.
D.S. was part Native American and wanted to learn more about her
heritage and participate in Native American activities and
rituals. Since about August 1991, D.S. had been participating in
monthly prayer meetings as part of her Cherokee ancestry. She had
discussed these in therapy with respondent, how it felt really good
and how she felt a real connection. Respondent told her that a lot
of people who had CE-IV experiences had a need for a spiritual
belief and many identified with the Native American belief because
of the concept of interrelationship and the living earth. About
November 1992 respondent said at meetings and in therapy with D.S.
that there was some interest in the CE-IV group in forming a side
group dealing with the spiritual aspects of CE-IV, with special
interest in Native American spirituality. Respondent asked if D.S.
wanted to participate, and she indicated she did.
In about February 1993, D.S. got a call giving her the time and
place for the first meeting of the side group. D.S. understood
the meeting would be to talk about the concept and direction, and
to find some connection between CE-IV and spiritual belief. D.S.
met respondent and some others at the American River. Respondent
brought a backpack with certain Native American ceremonial items in
it. He brought out what appeared to be a Hopi rattle, a pipe,
tobacco and cedar. He lit some cedar, blew it out and used it to
smudge participants for cleansing. He said they would load the
pipe, pass it around and each person would say a prayer, smoke from
the pipe and pass it on. Respondent asked each person to make a
statement about their Native American beliefs. D.S. became
frightened by the experience. She did not feel right. She thought
the items were being used as a show and that participation was
disrespectful. When it was her time to speak, she said she had
nothing to add. Respondent became angry with her for failing to
participate.
A few days later, D.S. went to her scheduled therapy session. By
that time she no longer trusted respondent and no longer considered
him a caring person. She ceased her relationship with him on the
spot.
Respondent's diagnosis at termination was:
Page[ 16
ooOOoo
--- Msgedsq 2.2e
* Origin: My Pal Foot Foot (Houston) (1:106/9788.2)
SEEN-BY: 102/2 138 435 752 837 890 943 1013 147/7 270/101 280/1 9
25 26 31 45
SEEN-BY: 280/115 135 333 378 396/1
@PATH: 30873/2 106/9788 888 449 2000 270/101 280/1 102/2 752 943
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(1449) Wed 11 Oct 95 4:30
By: J.J. Hitt
To: David Dahl
Re: Boylan - Pages 17 & 18
----------------------------------------------------------------------
@EID:8df9 1f4b23c0
@MSGID: 1:106/9788.2 5b92ad97
@REPLY: 1:272/85.666 cc2ddbe3
Axis I: Factitious Disorder with Psychological Symptoms
(Psychological
Munchausen Syndrome);
Axis II: Personality Disorder NOS (Addiction to Victim Identity
Syndrome)
The evidence did not establish that respondent discussed with D.S.
intimate
details of his sexual relationship with his wife.
VI
Respondent has been involved with counseling for about 30 years,
first as a
Catholic priest, and later as a licensed therapist. He has no prior
disciplines. Respondent was employed by community agencies, such
as the Marin
and Calaveras County Mental Health Departments, before opening a
private
practice. He is married and the father of two and the stepfather
of two. AT
the time of the Accusation by the Board of Psychology, respondent
was president
of the Sacramento Valley Psychological Association.
Respondent was not fueled by evil motive. He believes in
extraterrestrial life
and believes he has had ET experiences. In 1989, he had he had
three patients
who presented with stories of ET contact. It was those contacts
that inspired
his interest in researching ET issues. He formed the CE-IV group
so that
experiencers would have others with whom to share, so they would
not feel
isolated.
While respondent believes that there is nothing intrinsically
erotic or wrong
with nudity, he also had no understanding that others, and in
particular his
patience here, might not be as comfortable as he in nudity with
others. While
he may not have had a sexual motivation, these patients considered
at least some
of his actions to raise sexual issues. Respondent showed an
incredible lack of
insight in failing to appreciate the distress he caused these
patients.
Respondent has participated in individual therapy since these events.
Unfortunately, his therapist did not testify. While respondent
testified that
he has learned of possible errors, he did not express understanding
of his
misconduct. When he did address the charges, and possible
wrongdoing on his
part was conditional, or placed responsibility on others. For
example, when
asked if he would handle the hot tubbing situation differently,
rather than
saying something like, "I would not do it. I would not put my
patients at
risk," respondent replied:
"Absolutely... First of all, given the fact that a
current client was involved, even though I had drawn
the conclusion that she had resolved the abuse
traumatic issues to the point where there was minimal
Page[ 17
to no risk of resurfacing or exacerbation of them, upon
further reflection, it has become obvious that one can
never have total certainty that a person will not
interpret or misperceive or be told by someone else that
they ought to have a perspective about that experience.
Or in all the other ways in which one can, however
innocent an even is,derive a sense of harm. So that
is one consideration that would lead me not to
reengineer such an event.
"Another consideration is that it has become abundantly
clear to me by subsequent statements by knowledgeable
persons, including the board's experts, that the
contemporary reading on standards of practice does not
include therapist nudity in the presence of patients
regardless of innocence or safety of situation or
patient's level of recovery or proximity of termination
of therapy."
"And I could go on and on if need be, but there are
compelling considerations that would make it quite
clear to me that that is not a situation that needs to
repeat. And in hindsight, should (not) have taken
place the way it did." (R.T. 1/12 - 1/13/95 213:5 -
214:8)
Respondent said he would not repeat the kind of conduct that
occurred here.
However, it was not established that respondent has gained any
insight, only
that he has learned from this disciplinary hearing experience that
certain
conduct is unacceptable. Respondent never apologized for what he
did.
Respondent never admitted what he did was wrong.
VII
Most of the material facts in this matter were not in dispute. In
some
circumstances, the differences represent the different perspectives
of the
persons involved. The complaining witnesses, D.W., K.G. and D.S.,
appeared to
testify accurately to the best of their recollection. It was clear
that D.W.
had a history of being highly suggestible, adopting as her ideas
and beliefs
those of people around her and authors she had read. D.S. still
carried a lot
of anger toward and distrust of respondent. K.G. felt she was worse
emotionally after her therapy with respondent.
For the most apart, respondent was credible, although putting his
own spin on
events. However, he was also evasive, and at times pompous. He
attacked the
complaining witnesses' credibility and stability (by his final
diagnosis,) yet
for the same time period he had been seeking written reports from
two of
Page[ 18
ooOOoo
--- Msgedsq 2.2e
* Origin: My Pal Foot Foot (Houston) (1:106/9788.2)
SEEN-BY: 102/2 138 435 752 837 890 943 1013 147/7 270/101 280/1 9
25 26 31 45
SEEN-BY: 280/115 135 333 378 396/1
@PATH: 30873/2 106/9788 888 449 2000 270/101 280/1 102/2 752 943
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(1450) Wed 11 Oct 95 4:31
By: J.J. Hitt
To: David Dahl
Re: Boylan - Pages 18-20 (end)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
@EID:1cbf 1f4b23e0
@MSGID: 1:106/9788.2 5b92b0ab
@REPLY: 1:272/85.666 cc2ddbe3
them for his book on ET encounters and had one (D.W.) accompany him
to speak at a UFO conference shortly before his final diagnosis.
Respondent argued that he had treated D.W., and especially D.S.,
for some time before the ET issue arose. However, it arose at
approximately the same time for both patients -- March 12, 1992 for
D.S. and for D.W., shortly before the respondent left for his
reconnaissance tour in April 1992. By this time, respondent was
well into his research on the "secret government" and its efforts
to disinform the public of UFOs and ETs. He had already advertised
for research subjects who thought they might have had ET
experiences. And it was shortly before the formation of his CE-IV
group. His focus at that time was on extraterrestrial issues. At
best he inadvertently allowed that focus to move into therapy as
the primary interpretation of dreams and memories.
VIII
The Board of Behavioral Science Examiners established costs of
$9205. No cost declarations were filed by the board of Psychology.
DETERMINATION OF ISSUES
I
While the patients in this matter each questioned, at times, the
sexual motivation of respondent, it was not established he in fact
has such motivation while providing therapy or other relationships
to these patients. It is not necessary for respondent's motivation
to be sexual for sexual abuse to occur. Great weight must be given
to the "victim's" perspective. Here, however, the victims were not
sure what was going on. There was no sexual contact. They were
upset and confused. The evidence did not establish sexual
misconduct in violation of Business and Professions Code sections
726, 2960(o), 4982(k) or 4992.3(k)
II
Respondent abused his role as a therapist and was grossly
negligent, in violation of Business and Professions Code section
2960(j),
4982(d) and 4992.3(d) in imposing his personal views of D.W. and
D.S., as set forth in Finding III and V.
page[ 19
III
Respondent committed gross negligence, in violation of Business and
Professions
Code sections 2960(j), 4982(d) and 4992.3(d) when he developed an
inappropriate
dual relationship with D.W. that included travel together to and
around Las
Vegas, as established bt Findings III.
IV
Respondent committed gross negligence, in violation of Business and
Professions
Code sections 2960(j), 4982(d) and 4992.3(d), when he gave D.W. a
massage in
his hotel room in Las Vegas, as established by Findings III.
V
Respondent committed gross negligence, in violation of Business and
Professions
Code sections 2960(j), 4982(d) and 4992.3(d), when he invited D.W.
to his home
in November 1992 and engaged in nude hot tubbing, as established by
Findings
III.
VI
The evidence did not establish that respondent suggested that he
perform a vaginal examination on D.W.
VII
Respondent committed gross negligence, in violation of Business and
Professions
Code sections 2960(j), 4982(d) and 4992.3(d), when he invited K.G.
to his home
in December 1991 and engaged in nude hot tubbing, as established by
Findings IV.
VIII
It was not established that the act of inviting K.G. and D.S. for
nude therapy sessions at Harbin Hot Springs amounted to gross
negligence, in violation of Business and Professions Code sections
2960(j), 4982(d) and 4992.3(d).
IX
Respondent committed gross negligence, in violation of Business and
Professions
Code sections 2960(j), 4982(d) and 4992.3(d), when he bartered
therapy for nude
massages from K.G., as established by Findings V.
X
Respondent committed gross negligence, in violation of Business and
Professions
Code sections 2960(j), 4982(d) and
Page[ 20
4992.3(d) by shifting the focus of D.S.'s therapy from her presenting
problems to his interest in ET encounters, as established by
Findings V.
XI
While it may have been thoughtless, or possibly negligent for
respondent to try
to recreate a Native American ritual with D.S. present, it did not
rise to the
level of gross negligence.
XII
It was not established that respondent discussed with D.S. details
of his
sexual relationship with his wife.
XIII
Determinations II - V, VII, IX and X, and each of them are grounds
for
discipline.
ORDER
-----
I
The Psychologist, Licensed Social Worker and Marriage, Family and
Child
Counselor licenses issued to respondent Richard Boylan are revoked.
II
Respondent shall pay costs to the Board of Behavioral Science
Examiners in the
sum of $9205/
Dated: (August 1, 1995)
----------------
[Signature appears on document]
-------------------------------
MURIEL EVENS
Administrative Law Judge
Office of Administrative Hearings
page[ 21
[end]
ooOOoo
--- Msgedsq 2.2e
* Origin: My Pal Foot Foot (Houston) (1:106/9788.2)
SEEN-BY: 102/2 138 435 752 837 890 943 1013 147/7 270/101 280/1 9
25 26 31 45
SEEN-BY: 280/115 135 333 378 396/1
@PATH: 30873/2 106/9788 888 449 2000 270/101 280/1 102/2 752 943
Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the
author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and
opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The
opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.