The following article was transcribed by Bob Smith for
original posting on the Southern Maryland Christian
Information Service Computer BBS operated by Buggs Bugnon.
It has been posted, with permission, from the January -
February issue of the Midnight Messenger.
The Midnight Messenger is a periodical which in my opinion
best strikes at the root cause of the frustration we patriots
feel with the direction our nation is headed these days.
Namely this is the official government disdain for and
institutionalized persecution of Christianity and God's Word.
The essence of which, is best consolidated under the umbrella
of the drive for a "NEW WORLD ORDER"!
A subscription ($24.00 per year) to the Midnight Messenger
can be obtained by writing to:
Midnight Messenger
9205 SE Clackamas Rd, #1776
Clackamas, OR 97015
(503) 824-2050
Please do not delete this section from this file.
=============================================================
Begin Quote:
POLICE OFFICERS AND THE NEW AGE
The article that follows is the text of a speech
delivered by a Police Chief in the United States of America.
The Chief later sent a copy to the police-oriented
publication, Aid and Abet. Aid and Abet publisher Police
Officer Jack McLamb (Retired) assures us of it's
authenticity.
Although the concepts expressed herein may be totally
repugnant to you, our readers, we at Midnight Messenger
believe that a knowledge and understanding of them is a
"must." We believe that what the Chief says is a plain
statement of "how it really is" in the United States today.
As stated at the conclusion of the article, the writer
has used a pseudonym because he does not wish to make himself
known at this time.
1
HYPOCRITES ATTACK DISHONEST POLICE OFFICERS
The following is a letter from Police Chief Rupert
Orpheus:
To the question of, "Do some judges, prosecutors and
police officers today commit dishonest acts to put criminals
away?" I answer an unequivocal, Yes! But it is hoped that
it is not done without just cause. True immorality exists
only when the cause is not just.
After more than 20 years of service to my fellow
Americans I realize what reality is. The truth is that today
many judges, attorneys, police officials and officers are
devotees of the religion of Secular Humanism (S.H.), myself
included.
Some of our members (mainly out of fear) will not admit
that S.H. is a religion. They are apprehensive that we may
be treated as the so called "Christians" have been treated
under the doctrine of Separation of Church and State. Such
fear might be well founded if this were 15 to 20 years ago.
Not so today. Reason being, colleagues of our faith are, for
the most part, in control of the agencies and organizations,
such as the ACLU, ABA, Justice Department etc., that would
normally protest such cases. Although this may at first seem
unfair, it is not. But allow me to proceed, and I believe
you will come to full understanding of this and many other
important facts.
My feelings are that it is time we shepherds open the
eyes of our flock and further sort out those we cannot take
with us into the 21st. century. Any that would deny that our
religion of S.H. is not a valid religion should do their
homework. The Supreme Court decided that it is a religion
some years ago in the Torcaso vs Abington, Abington vs
Schempp, and in Torcaso vs Watkins cases. According to the
High Court, it is "...belief, not creed, or cult which
appears to be the essence of religion." It further explains
that, "...belief refers to some sort of universal view of
life, of the world of mankind - a belief that is held to be
true about mankind." In essence the Supreme Court said that
one's religion can be "...any world view with or without
reference to GOD, theistic or non-theistic in nature". I
hope this helps others to understand our Faith. However,
this of course is not the main point of my speech.
MIS-TREATMENT OF HUMANIST OFFICERS
I wish to address the abuse of Police Officers who
ascribe, knowingly or unknowingly, to the moral tenets of our
religion in regards to ethics and morals. Nationwide our
devotees are enduring horrible discrimination at the hands of
2
a very hypocritical faction of society, the Christians. This
discrimination comes as we Humanists exercise our own
religious beliefs and apply our morals "on the job", so to
speak. Yet, other officers may apply their own individual
belief systems (morals and ethics) at will, without any
condemnation. This is undeniable discrimination!
Fortunately, our religion is the fastest growing of any
in all of history and many of the younger generation within
the criminal justice system, including police officers, who
ascribe to sound Secular Humanist principals are now in
management which is of benefit to all. This does give us
sway power, and is a plus for our side. Still, there is far
too much discrimination against those who would apply a most
important principle of our religion -- "Situation Ethics".
The principal of Situation Ethics allows the individual
to focus correctly on only the goal to be accomplished.
Morally speaking, little if any consideration need be given
to the method or means, as nothing else supersedes its
importance. Of course concern is given to finding a means of
accomplishing a task or goal, so as to have the least
negative impact on the least amount of our people.
In my youth I recall hearing the great Green Bay Packers
coach Vince Lombardi describe it this way: "Winning is not
everything; it is the only thing." Much of our society lives
by this principal today. Yes, even many of those who
"profess other faiths" and occupy pulpits throughout America.
Personally, I think the principle of Situation Ethics is best
described by examining the legal definition of ethics and
morals given by our now compatriots, the Communists. The
Communist definition is: "EVERYTHING is ethical and moral as
long as it promotes World Communism." This is pure Secular
Humanism. We can learn much, incidentally, about total
commitment from the Communists. The Marxists have, out of
pragmatic necessity, expurgated a minimum of 90 million
people in the pursuit of man's noblest mission -- world
peace. What intelligent person could call "immoral" any
means used to accomplish this all important goal?
In our great Humanist Manifesto signed in 1933 and 1973,
we explain our moral creed which is very much the same as the
Marxist creed, yet set forth in much more palatable and
tactful terms. Here is a brief summation of our beliefs
regarding Ethics and Truth:
ETHICS
"Moral values derive their source from human experience.
Ethics is autonomous and situational, needing no theological
or ideological sanction. Ethics stems from human need and
3
interest. To deny this distorts the whole basis of life...
We strive for the good life, here and now." -- Humanist
Manifesto II, 1973.
AUTHORITY AND TRUTH
"We reject those features of traditional religious
morality that deny humans a full appreciation of their own
potentialities and responsibilities. Traditional religions
often offer solace to humans, but, as often, they inhibit
humans from helping themselves or experiencing their full
potentialities... We can discover no divine purpose or
providence for the human species... Humans are responsible
for what we are or will become. No deity will save us: we
must save ourselves." -- Humanist Manifesto II, 1973.
After 20 plus years of conditioning, our society now
largely subscribes to this philosophy. Some of you who
practice "selective" Christianity are closer to our faith
than to the superstitions of the Bible Thumpers of old. (In
selective Christianity, of course, you choose to believe in,
and discard the parts that are not convenient.) Don't you
see that in this we are just alike? Your "faith" is actually
based on what is right under man's desire. We Humanists are
in fact more honest. We admit that there is no God -- that
it is only Man's desires that are important. You leaders of
these "selective Christians" preach that your faith is based
on some parts of "God's Law" but, in actuality the majority
is based on what feels good or is convenient.
Quite obviously, America's government now operates under
the guiding principles of Humanism. Deception, lying,
cheating, stealing, killing is all moral if it promotes the
attainment of our essential goals. This is true
righteousness. A prime example can be seen in the recent
war against Iraq. Over 250,000 have lost their lives so far,
and more are dying every day -- all for the attainment of a
higher good, the goal of our great Humanist leaders: WORLD
PEACE through World Government.
This New Age teaching is the reason why, for example, a
police officer (one of Secular Humanist persuasion) is likely
to risk his very life to save a member of society one moment
and the very next moment take the witness stand and lie in
order to win an important case. This is not to be considered
immoral, given the particular standard of ethics upon which
such an officer bases his morality -- namely, that the end
justifies any means. (In other words again, the "Higher
Good" principle!) Many people still do not understand this.
They don't understand that this is why our presidents and
their staffs, members of Congress and hosts of others with
leadership roles in America -- lawyers, judges, etc. -- lie
4
and cheat right along side our dedicated humanist Law
Enforcers. To repeat, all for the greater good of society,
i.e. the system.
What the Masses must be made to understand, and never be
allowed to forget, is that this is for their own good. They
should know by now that those who are actually in control of
our government (as Col. Oliver North explained) truly know
what is best for the people. They must also know that under
the New World Order, the Justice System's primary mission
will be to protect the system from the masses. It is
precisely in view of this that we on the inside have been
obligated all along to use the system to suppress dissenters
as quickly as possible -- before any radical Anti-World
Government, Anti-Humanist group can gain the upper hand.
You're aware of course, that the vast majority of
Americans seek only peace and security. They hardly even
realize that they have virtually made government their new
god, to which they turn for the fulfillment of every need.
Our New Age leaders (and we soldiers as their "arms and
legs") stand ready to give the Masses all for which they
pray.
Let me repeat: Our job within the Criminal Justice
system today is to protect the PLAN, the SYSTEM, and punish
those that our leaders decide are enemies of that System. Of
course now, as with our Soviet colleagues, under New Age
Humanist Situation Ethics, we are not limited in the methods
we may apply to win. We can therefore proceed with
unobstructed haste to make the masses safe and peaceful.
Let's look again at our example of that police officer
who routinely risks his life for others and yet will lie on
the witness stand to help his government win some case in
court. If some of you are still surprised at this then
perhaps you haven't understood what I have been trying to
convey. Nor have you understood what your children have
learned so well over the last 20 years within the government
school system.
It is that we are living in a new age where man has
wisely placed his trust in government instead of some
superstition called the divine or God. It is the old
religious morals that have caused all of our problems. A new
age calls for a new belief system, a new moral code, a new
religion. It is exciting to see most all of the religions of
the world coming nicely together, united in preparation to
serve the New World Order. We must all dedicate ourselves
to obeying our leaders without question and to the
instruction of succeeding generations toward our utopian
goals of World Peace.
5
I would like to introduce you to one present-day scholar
Dr. Sidney Simon, who has been very effective, and deserving
of much credit for his efforts in this work of re-educating
humanity. He speaks plainly and his meaning is unmistakable,
as when he says:
"We do not need any more preaching about right and
wrong. The old 'thou shalt nots' simply are not relevant."
He goes on to explain to the child educators he is addressing
that "values clarification" is a method for teachers to
change the values of children 'without getting caught'.
(Values Clarification is another term for situation Ethics).
A book in use by our educators called, Weep For Our
Children, spells out "values clarification" as part of the
new morality.
"It's OK to lie. It's OK to steal. It's OK to have
premarital sex. It's OK to cheat or to kill if these things
are part of your value system, and you have clarified these
values for yourself. The important thing is not what values
you choose, but that you have chosen them yourself freely and
without coercion of parents, spouse, priest, friends,
ministers or social pressure of any kind." It is such S.H.
proponents in the government schools (the teachers) whom we
can thank for re-molding the values of these next
generations.
When the government national Child Care bill is passed
it will be a great day for Humanists and proponents of World
Peace. What wonders we can achieve once we have the
attention of the nation's pre-schoolers for 6 to 9 hours a
day! Look what we have already accomplished with the older
age groups of America's youth.
As I hinted earlier, this new society, based on the
deity of Man, will demand a new kind of Law Enforcer.
One of our educators said to me some weeks ago,
"America's religious zealots of the past would be shocked at
the changes the people have allowed." She was correct, for
after all, it was James Madison that said, "We have staked
the whole future of American civilization, not upon the power
of government, far from it. We have staked the future
...upon the capacity of each and all of us to govern
ourselves, to sustain ourselves, according to the Ten
Commandments of God."
Ah, but it is a new day, and we are fast proceeding into
the 21st Century. Americans no longer wish to assume the
responsibilities of governing themselves. Happily, for them,
there is a whole new generation of very dedicated leaders and
enforcers in government to see that they are cared for.
6
ENFORCEMENT MANPOWER
Let me address for a moment the question of Police
manpower. As the citizens relinquish, out of fear, more of
their rights, more Enforcers are required to regulate and
supervise the people's activities so that they remain safe
and peaceful. Who would have thought 100 years ago that the
integration of fear of literally everything would have been
the answer to establishing the New World Order? Credit for
this innovation goes to the Free Thinkers of the last
generation.
Now the older generation known as "Peace Officers",
"Servants of the People", might not so readily have adopted,
nor fit into, this new order of things. Fortunately, this
has not posed too great a problem, due to the fact that they
are rapidly being replaced through natural attrition, i.e.
death or retirement. The next 7 or 8 years will see the last
of them removed.
At the same time, police agencies are of necessity
attempting more and more to screen out before hiring those
prospective officers who believe in the old religious
superstitions. This is wise because these zealots will not
do the things that will be required of them under the new
system. Those remaining police officers who openly profess a
belief system steeped in old world Religious Fundamentalism,
can be and are being phased out on any number of charges,
such as can be substantiated over time or with the help of a
little innovation on the part of new management.
Some of the "old time" officers complain that this type
of job discrimination is "unconstitutional and immoral", but
we know they are wrong. Under Situation Ethics all things
are moral as long as they promote the goal. Therefore they
are not being removed for any evil cause; they are
incompatible and simply non-functional for the duties that
will be required of them.
SUPERVISING A HYPOCRITICAL PUBLIC
I feel I need to say again that if a professional police
officer must lie against those who violate the Law, then it
is moral. The same is true when government judges and
attorneys withhold evidence and witnesses from the jury to
win their cases. When a politician lies to win an office, or
makes deals that promote the New Order, it is moral.
Let me tell you what is truly immoral. I will use the
issuance of traffic violations as only one example. True
immorality is when 5 out of 10 "good upstanding citizens"
take the witness stand, swear an oath to their God, and then
proceed to fabricate lies to get out of their tickets. This
7
our Enforcement Officers witness daily in court. To them
this is not only immoral but highly hypocritical.
The Enforcer's dishonesty helps society as a whole. If
a government agent lied for personal reasons it would be
immoral; if done for the betterment of mankind, it is not.
And that is the most important lesson I bring you today. It
is one thing when a leader, or agent of government has to lie
or otherwise deceives his subjects. It is quite another when
an ordinary individual from among the masses, "bites the hand
that feeds him" by lying to those who are bringing salvation
in this brave new world. Do we see this important
difference?
The Old World understood that it was the greatest of
sins to lie to or deceive God. The generations of devotees
that wish to enter the New World must likewise be brought to
the understanding that it is the greatest of sins to lie to
or deceive their new God, Government. Any such disloyalty
would surely hamper the progress of those engaged in ushering
in the glorious New World Order.
RESISTANCE TO THE NEW ORDER
We are not concerned with the few who may resist this
New Order, for out of pragmatic necessity their fate has been
amply allowed for in the Master Plan. What we are most
concerned about at present is that the obedient masses be
made to understand that it is detrimental to progress for
them to suggest that their Supervisors wallow under the
pressure and futility of the antiquated superstitions, morals
and dogma of the past. There will be some difficult changes
facing the person entering this New Society. On these
issues, however, we can assure the people there will be no
compromise.
Thank you for listening. May the blessing of the New
Order come swiftly upon us.
So Mote It Be.
EDITOR: This article was presented to Aide and Abet for
publication by a long-time member of the Police profession.
The writer has used a pen name ... because he does not wish
to make himself known at this time...
It would be a rare officer reading the Chief's article
who would not be mentally aroused by it. Whereas most of his
ideas expressed are at variance to my own views, he
nonetheless has raised a number of points I can agree with.
Several of these are:
8
1. The direction in which Law Enforcement and our
Democratic Socialist government is rapidly heading -
-- i.e., toward world government.
2. A cleverly deceived and slumbering Public truly is
responsible for having traded its liberties for
security.
3. It is brilliance (not stupidity or accident) that
allows us to not solve the nation's crime problem.
4. There does exist an elaborate plan (developed behind
the scenes by anti-God forces) that is directing our
nation's slide into totalitarianism.
5. The true Christian Police officer who is still in
the profession honestly will not fit in with the
prevailing mores of the New World Order. He
absolutely will not be able to commit the acts
against fellow countrymen that will be required of
him. Such officers are already being put to the
test today.
One point on which I'll take issue with Chief Orpheus
concerns the number of honest, dedicated, morally-sound
lawmen still serving on the force today. However far
downward the more sinister forces of change may have carried
us thus far, I still believe that the percentages of "old-
school", rock-solid, high-principled officers remaining is
considerably higher than the Chief seems to suggest. I know,
because I hear from many of the good ones here at Aide and
Abet.
The Chief is correct that before the plan of the New
World Order can take effect these officers will have to go.
Their replacements are to be programed, anti-God, non-
thinkers, (Humanistic!) who will do what they are told
without any questions or hesitation. Many officers have
witnessed that even today only the best followers get
promoted. Therefore many currently in Police Management are
defenders of the System and are no longer on the side of the
People.
These remaining good officers -- who exactly are they?
Some are now well-informed Patriots who are working with us
to educate their fellow officers, attempting to return them
to true service of the People.
Then there is that quite larger group, also fiercely
patriotic and dedicated to serve. These latter, however
(usually through no fault of their own) have in varying
degrees been misled and deceived by those from whom they
received their education and training. Whether by design or
default, they have been deprived of a correct understanding
9
of their proper role of service in society; likewise they
have been largely kept in the dark as to who the real enemy
of our nation is.
Thirty-five percent of these good officers are Viet Nam
War Vets. Some are National Guardsmen and Reservists who
served in the recent war against Iraq. They are worth
saving, for they love America with a vengeance, just as does
the retired Vet and Cop putting out this publication. There
are a million-plus brave, dedicated Street Soldiers out there
that are supposed to belong to "We the People".
My job, with the help of many police colleagues and
private sector Patriots, is to win them back to our side.
It looks certain we are going to need them in the days
ahead.
(Jack McLamb, editor of Aide and Abet may be reached at:
Box 8787, Phoenix, AZ. 85066. Subscription: $20.00 per
year.)
EDITOR, Midnight Messenger:
It is apparent to anyone acquainted with the various
buzz words used in secret societies that the writer of the
above article is a high level Mason.
Through his use of the words "morals and dogma" and the
phrase "so mote it be," this Police Chief is sending a
message to those readers who may also be members of the
secret orders. His message? "What I have just told you is
the way it really is. This is exactly what we are going to
do."
Orpheus, the pseudonym used by the Police Chief, is also
of interest. "Orpheus: in mythology, a bard of Thrace who
evoked such magic strains from his lyre as caused beasts and
birds to follow him and trees and rocks to move" (Websters
New World Dictionary). Orphism: "The system of mystic
philosophy embodied in the Orphic poem, and taught to the
initiated in the Orphic mysteries" (The Oxford Universal
Dictionary).
Need we say any more?
End of Quote.
=============================================================
10
Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the
author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and
opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The
opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.