From: twcaps@tennyson.lbl.gov (Terry Chan)
Subject: Re: Sources on "Hooker" please
Date: 29 Aug 1993 02:31:47 GMT
bjb@cs.mu.OZ.AU (Bruce J. Baker) writes:
-I gave an interested colleague a copy of the FAQ recently and he saw the
-entry on the origin of the term "Hooker" mentioned. He sent me the
-following message seeking info...
-----------------------------------------------------
-Subj: hooker
-
-Bruce . . . because of some reasons I won't go into I have been checking a
-variety of referebce books recently to determine the origins of the word
-hooker, to see whetehr it is in fact linked to general Hooker of the
-American civil war.
[some details deleted]
-I would, quite seriously, be very intersted to hear from anyone who can claim
-to know the authentic origin.
-Tony Jaques
-----------------------------------------------------
-He told me later he was actually writing a book on military mythology and
-wanted to pin this one down to know whether to include/exclude it.
Hard to say. Could be. The following is from posts by
Bruce Tindall:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Bruce.Tindall@launchpad.unc.edu (Bruce Tindall)
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
Subject: General Hooker and whores (FAQ)
Message-ID: <1992Dec29.234537.8199@samba.oit.unc.edu>
Date: 29 Dec 92 23:45:37 GMT
References: <28087@dog.ee.lbl.gov>
Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the
author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and
opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The
opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.