filename : RES1.TXT
added : ?
Christian Information Exchange
714-531-3834
Fountain Valley, CA
Sysop : Mike Wallace
"P" = PAUSE, SPACEBAR = EXIT
DID THE RESURRECTION REALLY HAPPEN?
SECTION 1
In considering the matter of the Resurrection of Jesus
Christ, it is important to show that each and every one of
the present "theories" claiming that it did not happen is
delt with, in turn. Therefore, it is on this basis that we
will show by the elimination of any other possibility, that
the Resurrection not only occured but that all known
arguments against it are unfounded and can be rejected as
invalid.
Any explanation of the resurrection MUST take into
consideration the following features:
1. It must incorporate all known facts surrounding the
resurrection event.
2. We cannot "whittle" the evidence into a presupposed
mold. We must evaluate the evidence or events in
context and within reason of logic - or - "could it
have happened that way?"
In this vein, there are to major considerations - CHRIST'S
TOMB WAS EITHER (1) OCCUPIED OR IT WAS (2) EMPTY.
I. CHRIST'S TOMB WAS OCCUPIED
A. Unknown Tomb
This theory was based, primarily, on the historical
documentation that indicated that crucified victims were
cast over a particular wall in Jerusalem and burned in a
trash pit. This theory was difficult to refute -other than
the Gospels - until 1968 when the grave of a crucified
victim was located in a family tomb just outside of
Jerusalem (Yohanan ben Ha'galgal). The other major failings
of this is (1) even if the disciples and the women did not
know where the grave, Joseph of Arimathea DID; (2) the
Roman Guard knew where it was and (3) the women sat at the
entombment and dressing of the body.
B. Wrong Tomb
This theory is a variation on the Unknown tomb theory
in that the women went to the wrong tomb. The major
proponent of this heresy is one Professor Lake. He
concludes that the "gardener" told the women, "He is not
here, but see the place where they laid Him." The complete
text of what was said is recorded in the Gospel as "He is
not here, for He has risen, just as He said. Come, see the
place where He was lying.". Matthew clearly shows in 27:61
(Mark in 15:47 and Luke in 23:55) that the women had
clearly noted the location of the tomb less than 72 hours
before. The professor notes that this explanation provides
a natural explanation for the rock not being at the
opening. The professor picks and chooses his information,
but the parts that he ignores clearly refutes his position.
An additional thought is not as clearly refuting it, but
have you buried a loved one and ever lost the location of
that grave in your mind?
C. Legend Fantasy
This theory fails immediately when we read Paul's
comments that there were over 500 eyewitnesses still alive
to prove the resurrection. History proves the writings of
the Gospels and the accounts of the resurrection to be no
later than 56 A.D. The writings were directed to people
that could have, easily, gone to the grave themselves and
verified if the grave was empty. The FACT is that the
accounts were NOT written many years later.
D. Spiritual Resurrection Only
In Luke 24:39, Jesus Christ, himself, demolishes this
theory. Let's look at that verse. ******** READ **********
Later on, Jesus even eats some fish. this, again, proves a
body. Matthew tells how they grabbed the feet of Jesus. I
do not believe that you can grab the feet of a spirit! This
is a major precept of the Jehovah Witnesses.
E. Hallucinations
DEFINED: "wandering of the mind, idle talk, etc." but
the American Psychiatric Association defines it as "a false
sensory perception in the absence of an actual external
stimulus." ad elsewhere it is defined as "an apparent
perception of an external object when no such object is
present". It is also recognized by science that
hallucinations occur only in certain people and are linked
to the person's personal experiences. The fact that many
diverse people saw Jesus and all concurred with their
versions of that sighting negates this theory completely.
An hallucination does not sit down with you, eat with you,
allow certain persons to examine the wounds, or talk with
certain individuals of a group. Hallucinations are highly
subjective and no two people have ever been found to
experience the same hallucination - how then can 500 people
do so?! Hallucinations recorded are within a specific time
frame and under favorable conditions - usually the person
having the hallucination had been concentrating on the
object or desiring the object prior to the hallucination.
These conditions are absent in the resurrection. No
expectancy, fifteen different appearances, many different
people, 500 at one time to one or two people.
Hallucinations usually occur with regularity and this is
not the case here. When the day of Pentecost came, no other
reports or stories occured as to having seen the risen
Lord!
I wish to point out that NONE of the above theories uses
the two "rules" of evidence spoken of at the beginning of
this session.
If the tomb were EMPTY, then there are two additional
possibilities. These are (1) it was by NATURAL causes and
(2) it was due to SUPERNATURAL causes.
II. CHRIST'S TOMB WAS EMPTY DUE TO NATURAL REASONS
A. Stolen by Disciples
This theory is the most common (especially in Jewish
communities) possibility expressed. In fact, Matthew even
records this theory, but did not take time to refute it as
it was so false that he didn't feel the need to refute it.
It is recorded that the Roman guard went to the high priest
and were bribed to tell the stolen body story. This also
refute the idea that it was Temple Guards that guarded the
tomb - the high priest would not have needed to bribe his
own guards. (Matthew 28:11-15)
Let's take the matter on logic. If the Roman guard had
fallen asleep how could they have known that it was the
disciples that took the body. If you have ever watched
Perry Mason, you could well imagine an attorney getting
this testimony in court!
The other factor is to look at the possibility of the
ENTIRE guard unit falling asleep. This SECURITY UNIT of
the Roman army was the most devoted to duty because the
failure to be on guard meant certain death if discovered!
This unit was highly skilled in fighting and would have
made mincemeat of the disciples had they attempted to steal
the body. (Also look to Matthew 26:56 where he describes
the courage of the disciples "all the disciples left him
and fled"!!
The two ton boulder is another matter to contend with.
The Greek shows that the stone was not just moved to the
side but actually picked up and moved away from the tomb
area! I cannot picture anyone group of men being able to
move such a force without making enough noise to "wake the
dead"! This problem of the stone is really a "roadblock" to
any of the theories.
The final feature of this theory is to consider the
very character of the disciples. History records that these
men, because of some unexplained (secular world only)
reason, became men of the highest and purest though and
deeds. Their moral character and honor were NEVER
questioned by anyone - even the very people who put them to
death. The very idea that these men could conceive of such
a lie in direct conflict with what Jesus had taught and to
continue the lie EVEN TO THEIR OWN DEATHS is absurd. This
one factor is not recorded any where else in history. No
other person has had the testimony of men such as the
Apostles who never recanted their faith or their Lord. If
this had been a lie, these "ordinary" men did not break
under the most severe pressure. I can only believe that
ONLY a face to face confrontation with the Living Jesus
could have given them the knowledge that a death on this
Planet was only the door to be with the risen Lord!
Finally, if the body had been stolen, how can you
explain the manifestations of Christ to the many eye
witnesses - including the 500?
filename : RES2.TXT
added : ?
Christian Information Exchange
714-531-3834
Fountain Valley, CA
Sysop : Mike Wallace
"P" = PAUSE, SPACEBAR = EXIT
DID THE RESURRECTION REALLY HAPPEN?
SECTION 2
Illegal Trials
(intro to upcoming arguments C and D)
First, Jesus was subjected to SIX
TRIALS, three Roman and three
Jewish. The actuality of a man called
Pontius Pilate was considered fable
UNTIL 1961, when archaeologist in
the city of Caesarea uncovered a large
inscription which read, "Pontius
Pilate, Prefect of Judea, has
presented the Tiberium to the
Caesareans" and proves that such a
Roman Governor did exist. The
trials were [1] Annas, the high
priest [2] Caiaphas [3] the Sanhedrin
[4] Pilate [5] Herod and [6]
Pilate. History records that there
were two Sanhedrin bodies. One
onsisted of 23 members and tried
cases of capital punishment,
another consisted of 71 members
and was for trials of Heads of State,
High Priest or matters of crimes
against the Temple. The Sanhedrin of
23 was the most probable body that
tried Jesus. Second, the very
death by crucifixion was invented by
the Persians who felt that the
ground was concecrated to their
Gods and a death on the ground would
be against the gods; so they
invented a method of death that would
not defile the ground by placing
the people on a stake and later a
cross bar on a stake to lift them off
the ground and allow the
punishment of death to take place
without defilement to the gods.
Alexander the Great utilized the
crucifixion as a major deterent force.
The Romans felt the death was so
degrading that a Roman citizen could
ot be crucified except by order of
the Emperor and then this was
usually after the person's
citizenship was stripped from him.
The Romans usually reserved the
punishment for political cases.
The very accusation against Christ
was directed at political as you can
read in Luke 23:2. The Romans
added; However, another twist to
the process of crucifixion. The
added the "scourging" of the
criminal. This consisted of a period
of time that was set by the trial or
could be set by the scourgers,
themselves, of beating the accused
with a form of brass knuckled fist
and consisting of a minimum of six
men. This usually left the facial
features of the accused
unrecognizable. The next step of
the scourging consisted of the
whipping of the accused with a
Flagrum. This whip had numerous
eather thongs of various lengths
and braided into each of the
thongs were bits of metal and bone.
One Dr C.T. Davis has described the
whipping with the flagrum in this
manner: "The heavy whip is
brought down with full force again
and again across the accused's
shoulder, back and legs. At first
the heavy thongs cut through the skin,
only. Then, as the the blows
continue, they cut deeper into
the subcutaneous tissues, producing
first an oozing of blood from the
capillaries and veins of the skin,
and finally spurting arterial
bleeding from the vessels in the
underlying muscles. The small balls
of lead first produce large deep
bruises which are broken open by the
subsequent blows. Finally the skin
of the back is hanging in long
ribbons and the entire area is an
unrecognizable mass of torn,
leeding tissue. When it is
determined by the Centurion that
the prisoner in near death, the
beating is finally stopped". A
historian of the third century,
Eusebius writes "The sufferer's
veins were laid bare and the very
muscles, sinews,and bowels of the
victim were open to exposure.
After this ordeal, Christ had a crown
of thorns jammed into his head.
The blood from this act must have
been severe. Jesus was then
subjected to another beating with a
rod! After all this, our Lord was
then forced to carry His "patibulum"
to His place of execution. At the
place of execution, Christ was
nailed to his cross. History was
devoid of any proof that nails
were used until the discovery in
1968 of another tomb that
contained the remains of a person
who had been nailed, both hands and
eet, to a cross. History then came
to the defense of the Gospels and
once, again, the Bible is proven
correct.
C. Swoon Theory
This theory neglects to
consider the points of [1] Jesus
went through SIX TRIALS (3 Roman and 3
Jewish in less than 24 hours), [2]
Had been scourged by the Romans. [3]
Jesus was too weak to carry His
patibulum. [4] Spikes had been
driven through His hands and feet. [5]
The Roman guard thrust his spear
into Jesus's side and "blood and
water came out". [6] Four Roman
executioners confirmed the death of
Jesus - could experienced executioners
- four of them - really be wrong?
[7] The women placed the 100 pounds
of spices and wrap around Jesus and
ncased His body with the gummy
substance that the spices would have
made which would have made
breathing difficult if not impossible
[8] the tomb was cold and damp (40
degrees was suggested based on
similar temperatures read in such
tombs). This would have reduced any
circulation of Jesus even further.
[9] The two ton stone was lodged
against the tomb opening. The stone
was cut in such a manner to to make a
tight seal against the opening and
was, most likely, sealed further. The
need to eliminate the smell of
decomposition was great! [10] The
Roman guard was posted outside the
tomb and [11] the seal was present.
This theory would then have you
believe that this Jesus was revived
by the coolness, burst out of the
burial wrappings, pushed the boulder
AWAY from the tomb, fought off this
highly trained fighting guard unit and
ppeared to the Disciples as the
Lord of Life with no after effects of
such an ordeal. I, personally, would
have to contend that this explanation
is a miracle in itself! How
could a man who had suffered
these terrible punishments have
been able to make His disciples
believe that He was the Lord of Life
and was victor over death? How could
such an appearance have changed
cowards into the most powerful force
for God on earth as happened to EACH
ONE of the disciples? The answer
is SUCH AN APPEARANCE COULD NOT HAVE
- ONLY THE RESURRECTION AS IT IS TOLD
IN THE GOSPELS COULD ACCOUNT FOR
SUCH A CHANGE.
D. Passover Plot
Hugh Schoenfield proposed a variation
of the "swoon" theory in his book
he PASSOVER PLOT. It is proposed
in this book that Jesus had studied
the scriptures and had structured
His life in such a manner as to comply
with the prophesies of the Messiah
and convince the people that He was
the Messiah. The conspirators
consisted of Jesus, Joseph of
Arimathea and a "young man". Now the
plot was to have Jesus administered
a drug that would feign His death.
This was based on the fact that the
"bitter water" given to crucified
victims usually contained a narcotic
to allow the person to sleep ***.
Now the plan was to have Joseph take
the body to the tomb and revive
Jesus. The plot was short circuited
when the guard thrust his spear into
the side of Jesus. Jesus was
taken to the tomb and revived but
only lived a short time. Joseph
and the "young man" then disposed
of the body and emptied the tomb. Now
his "young man" was mistaken to be
the risen Lord by a hysterical Mary
and later the confused disciples
also mistook the "young man" as
Jesus. History does not record that
Joseph or the "young man" ever
corrected these misimpressions.
Mr Schoenfield does what most
proponents of "alternate
possibilities" do - he selects what
"evidence" he wants and negates or
ignores or disputes any "evidence" he
does not like. He adopts a
completely arbitrary basis for
acceptance of evidence and "no
rules" is the only rule. In the
circumstance of the Roman guard
placed at the tomb, Schoenfield
rejects this as it is only mentioned
in Matthew and if only one writer
comments on the matter then it can
be rejected. However, the matter of
the spear is a mainstay of
Schoenfield's theory and it is only
entioned in John! The very idea
that the change in the disciples and
the conversion of so many people
could be attributed to a case of
mistaken identity is so absurd as to
be rejected as the ramblings of a man
who finds the matter "foolish".
III. CHRIST'S TOMB WAS EMPTY
DUE TO SUPERNATURAL CAUSES
A. Bodily Resurrection
The Historical and Gospel facts show
that each and every one of the so-
called Natural explanations are
invalid and would not hold up in a
court of law. The reverse,
though, is clearly shown in that
the resurrection is a provable,
logical, historical and factual
occurance. The mind of man that
ill not accept the fact that God
the Creator of all things injected
His presence into the course of
Human History, will also accept
illogical, unproven fantasies to
prevent being face to face with the
living God, Jesus Christ our Lord and
Savior.
This being now shown as the ONLY true
alternative, based on historical
facts and logical deduction, then we
can be assured of the promises he
made to each of us because HE IS
RISEN!!!!!!
We follow the "Lamb of God" who died
for us and we are aware of HIS
sacrifice on our behalf. If you now
see the error that you presently live
in, we ask that you pray this prayer:
FATHER, I AM SORRY FOR MY SINS AND MY
SIN OF IGNORING YOUR WORD AND FOLLOWING
MEN TO BE THE ONES WHO CAN LEAD TO
SALVATION. I NOW KNOW THIS IS WRONG AND
AGAINST YOUR WORD AND HUMBLY ASK FOR
OUR FORGIVENESS AND MERCY. I
ACKNOWLEDGE THE SACRIFICE OF JESUS AS
PAYMENT FOR MY SINS AND THANK YOU FOR
THIS RELEASE. LORD JESUS, COME INTO MY
HEART AND LIVE THERE AND GUIDE MY STEPS
FROM THIS DAY FORWARD. ALLOW ME TO BE
YOUR VESSEL ON EARTH TO CARRY THE TRUE
MESSAGE OF YOUR LOVE TO ALL MEN. THESE
THINGS I NOW PRAY IN THE NAME OF MY TRUE
SAVIOR AND LORD, JESUS CHRIST. AMEN
If you just prayed this prayer,
please leave a message at the time of
termination of this call.
Computers For Christ - San Jose
****** END OF TEXT ****
Return to The Skeptic Tank's main Index page.
The views and opinions stated within this web page are those of the
author or authors which wrote them and may not reflect the views and
opinions of the ISP or account user which hosts the web page. The
opinions may or may not be those of the Chairman of The Skeptic Tank.