 All members of the Creation Research Society must sign a statement
 of faith.  This statement does not restrict itself to religious
 issues, but covers scientific ones as well.  Here is the text taken
 from their membership application:


      1. The Bible is the written word of God, and because we
      believe it to be inspired throughout, all of its assertions
      are historically and scientifically true in all the original
      autographs.  To the students of nature, this means that the
      account of origins in Genesis is a factual presentation of
      simple historical truths.

      2. All basic types of living things, including man, were made
      by direct creative acts of God during Creation Week as
      described in Genesis.  Whatever biological changes have
      occurred since Creation have accomplished only changes within
      the original created kinds.

      3. The great Flood described in Genesis, commonly referred to
      as the Noachian Deluge, was an historical event, worldwide in
      its extent and effect.

      4. Finally, we are an organization of Christian men of
      science, who accept Jesus Christ as our Lord and Savior.  The
      account of the special creation of Adam and Eve as one man and
      one woman, and their subsequent fall into sin, is the basis
      for our belief in the necessity of a Savior for all mankind.
      Therefore, salvation can come only through accepting Jesus
      Christ as Savior.


 Henry Morris has an interesting account of the founding of the CRS
 (in which he figured along with several other members bolting the
 more moderate American Scientific Affiliation) in his book _History
 of Modern Creationism_, Master Book Publishers, 1984.

 Both Morris and Walter Lammerts (the later being the dominant
 figure in the founding and early years of the society) were
 distressed at the fact of the American Scientific Affiliation's
 "drift" towards tolerance of evolution and acceptance of the theory
 by many of its members.  (The ASA is an organization of evangelical
 christians with scientific backgrounds founded in 1941 and still in
 existence.)

 Morris discusses the various creationist organizations which
 appeared in the period between the time of the Scopes trial and the
 emergence of today's "creation science" during and after the
 sixties.  A major theme in his treatment is that every group which
 did not formally establish a clear and irrevocable commitment to
 "strict biblical creationism" eventually failed.  They either
 disbanded entirely (often due to internal disagreements or
 infighting), or ended up accepting evolution (or at least
 conventional geology) in some substantial degree.

 I think that Morris makes his case fairly well.  He certainly
 demonstrated to my satisfaction that "creation science" cannot
 flourish in an atmosphere of free inquiry.  "Creation science"
 apparently only works when it is settled up-front what "scientific
 conclusions" are biblically acceptable, and which are verboten.

 In giving his account of the meeting (in 1963) at which the CRS was
 organized, Morris writes that:  "The most important decision was to
 set forth a firmly creationist statement of faith to which all
 members must subscribe and which could never be changed."  (p.186)
 This is exactly what was done, and Morris notes approvingly that:
 "At this writing (1984), the Society has continued for over 20
 years as a strong creationist organization, which is in itself a
 clear testimony to the wisdom of this initial action."  (p.187)

 Morris, however, could not be present at this meeting.  Believe it
 not (and those familiar with Morris will have no trouble believing
 it) Morris found the doctrinal statement above not to be strict
 enough!

 "Because of my experiences with the Creation-Deluge Society and the
 American Scientific Affiliation, as well as all of our contacts,
 studies, and feed back in connection with _The Genesis Flood_, both
 John Whitcomb and I had hoped that the new Society would take a
 clear and firm stand on the recent literal six-day creation of all
 things, as well as flood geology.  We were disappointed when these
 were not spelled out more clearly in the statement of faith adopted
 at Midland.  Nevertheless, the statement as adopted at least
 *implied* these truths and was a tremendous improvement over
 anything previously used by any similar organization."  (pp.
 191-92)

 [John Whitcomb co-authored _The Genesis Flood_ (Baker Books, 1961)
 with Morris.  This book is generally seen as heralding and
 stimulating the modern revival of young earth flood geology among
 fundamentalists.]

 At the first board meeting he did attend (in 1965), Morris tried to
 have the statement amended, but was foiled by the constitutional
 provision specifying that the statement could never be changed.

 "I was still very sensitive," Morris writes, "to the dangers of
 leaving these vital issues open to future accommodationist
 'interpretations.'  Finally, the Board did go on record with an
 understanding (one that would remain unwritten, however) that no
 publication of the Society, including articles published in the
 _Quarterly_, would ever advocate the 'old earth,' geological-ages
 position.  Of course, this unwritten understanding will probably
 maintain this doctrinal integrity just as long as the Society
 president and _Quarterly_ editor agree with it.  So far, this has
 been the case (as of 1984)."  (p.192)


 -Scott Faust
