ufo1@juno.com (Jack P. Sergent) . Jack! My man, my buddy, my pal! How nice of you to call! }:-} . Hang on... Let me get my coffee as I know how long your posts are. . fr> Hey, Jack! fr> Are you posting message in FidoNet SKEPTIC again? fr> I see that there is a message addressed to you in that fr> educational forum. . jps> Yes, Fred. It is just a feeble attempt to further my education. . Now I'm not one who likes to alarm people standing on the edge, but don't you think that by lacking any desire to do so, it would make that feeble attempt somewhat pointless? . Don't get me wrong; I mean, it's _great_ to see you return for another dose yet I do hope that this time you manage to bring with you some evidence for whatever you're going to claim this time -- alien flying saucers abducting people, perhaps? . If you could, some details about the various organized conspiracies set in motion to silence "the truth" would be nice this time around. Hopefully before your hard disk drive crashes again and you lose it all. . jps> ...Want to hear something funny? . You're not going to tell me you're not an idiot, are you? I have a cup of coffee here, after all, and only the one remaining keyboard. }:-} . jps> Sheppard is complaining to the moderator in FILM about jps> my tag line. . Yeah, that's _great!_ If it were true, however. Is this anything like your mysteriously invisible "evidence" about David Bloomberg and his -- what I must assume Satanic -- conspiracy to censor you some how? With his psychic powers, perhaps? I couldn't tell since you decided not to expand upon that hypothesis. . Do me a favor and forward evidence of this latest dastardly plot, would you please? Or, like the invisible evidence for David, must I ZipZap FileRequest your node and be told that the file doesn't exist again? . jps> Yet, he continues to includs (sic) his tag line about me in SKEPTIC. . That's my boy! He learned from the best, you know. And I see that he stopped invoking your name and, after you commented upon the fact, he resumed doing so. . There's nothing like asking for it and then complaining when you get what you want, huh? You should feel _honored_ that someone cares enough to bring your name up in polite conversation, Jack! If the constant burning of your ears adversely impacts the completion of your work you could go back to wearing the foil hat of yours or (you'll let me know if this works, I hope) wearing a pyramid on your head. . jps> It's like to cowboys pointing a pistol at each other. One says jps> to the other, "Lower your gun so I can shoot you without my jps> getting shot." . Golly. Sounds like the UFO echo, huh? Believers are allowed to make any unfounded claim "in safety," free from having to answer questions which the wicked old skeptics get ejected for asking. . Science knows your guns are empty, Jack. There's no reason to ask you to lower your weapons when you're already lying face down in the dirt. . jps> It never ceases to amaze me what some of you consider as jps> having fun. . How about dreaming up fantasies about getting abducted by aliens and then claiming it's true? That sounds like it could be fun... so long as there's a safe place where believers don't have to answer questions about such an enjoyable fantasy, of course. . Know anyplace like that? . jps> Don't you realize that I eventually built an immunity to the jps> slams at me over there? I just don't care anymore. . It's unfortunate that you've decided you don't care about the truth of a matter any more, Jack. Working you into an insensate position is never the intention of any educational entity, you know. . As for "slams," I haven't see any of these. Perhaps, while you're off collecting the evidence for your other claims about Mr. Bloomberg and Mr. Sheppard, if you run across any of these "slams" you can include them in your package to me. . Thanks in advance. }:-} . jps> That's why I'm back on SKEPTIC. So, just continue your fun. . Great! And, I hope, you won't be disappointing and continue to refuse to provide questions when asked. . jps> It's been good for my business on UFO. . Man, the appalling percentages of poor education in America is enough to give UFO and I_UFO a good number of participants. But you're right; when skeptics expose the lunacy of conspiracy mongers and flying saucer believers, it _is_ good publicity for believers. . Hell, skeptics _count_ on the phenomena, don't you think? . jps> Even Sheppard's tag line is now an asset to me. People are flocking jps> to UFO to see who the terrible monster, Jack Sargeant is. It's sort jps> of analogous of the story of the little boy who cried wolf. . That's great, Jack! I couldn't be happier for you. Some friendly advice, however: Just be sure not to make the mistake of mentioning any of these mysterious conspiracies of yours; conspiracies which are backed-up with evidence (which you consistently "forget" to post.) Some of the better educated participants might start to suspect that you don't have any. . jps> After so many of yours and Sheppard's lies, nobody cares or believes jps> that crapola anymore (if they ever did). . Curiously you "forgot" to include any examples to back up _that_ claim. Do you have any examples of these "lies" I've told about you? After all, the only thing I've said about you is replicated faithfully in my Comfortable Fantasies web page -- a web page you are free to evaluate for any "inaccuracies." . http://www.linkline.com/personal/frice/comfort.htm . If you spot any "lies," you'll be sure to let me know about them, won't you? And if you run across any lies spoken by Mr. Bloomberg or Mr. Sheppard, please forward a copy to me so that I might add them to the web page. . Thanks in advance. .