On Tue, 11 Mar 1997, Fredric Rice wrote:

> In fact, if you have authored other articles, I would _love_

You may check Impact articles, numbers 283, 172, and 164.

> I would be happy to review the article and cover any
> scientific fallacies involved within.  Please let me know
> if that's what you're looking for and I'll piece together
> the debunking immediately.

I would be interested to read your response.

> I don't know if I understand the question properly.  Are you
> asking for me to look-up the contemporary definition of the 
> word usage in the dictionary for you?  I can do that for you
> if you wish however it might be faster for you to look it
> up for yourself.

A cult is generally contrasted with orthodoxy in a religious sense. I'm 
wondering if your religion is Darwinism or Evolution. In your view, one 
or both of these would be orthodoxy, and anything that challenged that 
might be viewed as cultic. I may be way off base, but I'm trying to 
understand where you are coming from. I view myself as very orthodox in 
the theistic sense.

> ---  "de omnibus dubitandum"  All is to be doubted - Descartes  ---

Should I doubt the statement that all should be doubted?

Again, thank you for responding to my earlier questions.

Paul G. Humber, Philadelphia