Fellow skeptics, humanists, et al.: According to my publisher today (Tuesday, May 27), after only three weeks on the market WHY PEOPLE BELIEVE WEIRD THINGS has sold out of its initial print run of 15,000 copies and is now going into its second print run. This is considered very good. It's still a little early, however, since return figures will not be in for another couple of months (all books are sold on consignment--the book store takes no risk other than shelf space). The latest issue of Skeptic (Vol 5, #1) hits the bookstores and newstands this week and features a full page, four color ad for WEIRD THINGS on the back cover so that should boost sales, as will some more book signings and media interviews coming up next month. This new issue of Skeptic features James Randi on the cover (a beautiful portrait painted by the Skeptic Art Director, Pat Linse) and includes the premiere issue of SWIFT, the newsletter of the James Randi Educational Foundation (JREF) produced under the direction of Carol Kroll, Chip Denman, and Randi, of course. It features Randi's Pigasus Awards, a test of dowsing in Germany, human magnets, and a wonderful essay on Jonathan Swift, "arch-skeptic of human folly" by Chip Denman. If you do not already subscribe be sure to pick up a copy at your local Barnes & Noble, Borders, Crown, etc., or order one through the Skeptics Society office ($6.00). I encourage all of you, if you have not already done so, to join Randi's new group. He is really going full steam now, with his own building, seminar/lecture hall, book and video library, and, most importantly (since this is what he does best), equipment, space, time, and knowledge to conduct actual investigations. His snail mail address is: JREF, 201 SE Davie Blvd, Ft. Lauderdale, FL 3316. 954/467-1112, 954/467-1660 (fax), or e-mail: 76702.3507@compuserve.com In his lecture at the Skeptics Society conference this past weekend at Caltech, Randi called attention to the fact that the skeptical movement must adopt a win-win philosophy. We must all hang together, he noted, or we will hang separately. The skeptical movement is too small for any one organization to fall into the win-lose/sum-zero game mentality, with the fear that if one organization receives a member that means one less member for the other organization. There are now three major international skeptical organizations based in America (with others overseas). JREF and the Skeptics Society have banded together and will do everything they can to help one another, and any other skeptic's group that requests our assistance. We agree that just like all of you read more than one science publication, why wouldn't you read more than one skeptical publication? No one can cover all the things that need investigating. There is plenty of skepticism to go around. These comments were triggered, in part, by the discovery this weekend that a certain individual in Europe was offered special compensation by one skeptic's group IF he would give up dealing with a certain other skeptic's group. Needless to say this is hardly a win-win attitude. Its result, in fact, is lose-lose, especially for any group that makes such an offer. With the media attention and book tour for WEIRD THINGS, and with an 80% sell-through rate for SKEPTIC magazine (magazines are also sold on consignment), Barnes & Noble has doubled their order for SKEPTIC. We are anxious to see if the sell-through percentage holds at the higher order number. Our goal is to reach the 30,000 draw that Barnes & Noble has for Penthouse (we are only about 1/5th of that), whose sell-through is about 45% (you can only guess what happens to those 16,500 unsold copies of Penthouse after the bookstore employees rip off the covers and send them back to the distributors--a different fate, I suspect, than that of the bodies of SKEPTIC). This past weekend was the annual Skeptics Society Conference at Caltech. It went off much better than any of us suspected it would. We nearly filled the 300-seat Baxter Lecture Hall, and it seemed that every speaker tried to top the previous speakers in terms of humor, wit, and general entertainment value (they were all, of course, first-rate educational experiences). Frank Miele opened with a fabulous investigation of Pontius Pilate that included an imitation of Bill Clinton as a Roman prelate. Miele also offered his thoughts on what it means to be "skeptical," which brought new insight into the subject since he does not come from a traditional "skeptical" background. Vincent Sarich lived up to his reputation of generating controversy as he free-associated his way through numerous controversies in anthropology and society, including race and IQ, affirmative action, race-based quota hiring, meritocracy in the military, etc. Yours truly recapped the book tour in the context of the "science gap" in the media, with lots of anecdotes, some of which I've posted to this list. James Randi was at his entertaining best when he was introduced by Bernard Leikind, who was crazy enough to actually attempt a magic trick with Randi as the "volunteer" subject in front of nearly 300 people. Carol Tavris gave a brilliant exposition on the difference between therapists and experimentalists in the field of psychology, particularly noting the general acceptance amongst therapists that whatever patients describe as "what happened" in their past is to be accepted as "true," including bizarre stories of Satanic Ritual Abuse, torture, mutilation, sexual molestation, etc. Her lecture included video clips of therapists explaining that it doesn't really matter whether these things REALLY happened or not. What is important is that the patient THINKS they happened. Well, as Tavris pointed out, if THINKING that they happened results in someone being thrown in the slammer for life for sexual molestation, then it most certainly DOES matter. Frank Sulloway showed precisely how historians can practice scientific history, with several fascinating examples including a statistical "content analysis" he performed on Darwin's Beagle notes and letters. Sulloway discovered that Darwin's intellectual "shift" to the theory of evolution was not based so much on pure empirical evidence as it was on his confidence in himself and his ability to interpret that evidence. Following dinner the keynote speaker, Jared Diamond, summarized his 480-page book, GUNS, GERMS, AND STEEL, in 36 minutes, leaving, as he said, about 7 minutes per continent to explain why the world turned out as it did. Specifically he answered this question: why did Europeans conquer Native Americans and Australian Aborigines, rather than Native Americans and Australian Aborigines sailing to Europe to conquer Europeans? Before Diamond's lecture, Randy Cassingham, author of the two volumes of THIS IS TRUE and a columnist for SKEPTIC magazine ("DUMBTH NEWS"), gave the DUMBTH AWARD for 1996, that included the top 10 runners up (I'll post these awards later this week and they will appear in the next issue of Skeptic). Cassingham was hilarious as he rifled through example after example of stupidity, of which there is no shortage. Serious award winners included: John Mosley, of the Griffith Observatory, who won the Gardner Award for the "Best Investigative Journalism in Honor of Martin Gardner's Critical Analysis of Claims," for his article in Skeptic entitled "The Millennium is Coming." Tom McDonough, from Caltech and the Planetary Society, who won the Spinoza Award, AKA the "Skeptical Scholar in Honor of Baruch Spinoza's Efforts to Understand Human Actions" for his delightful reviews of films related to the paranormal and UFOs, entitled "Extraterrestrial Hollywood." Both of these awards were presented by Skeptic Senior Editor Bernard Leikind. Patt Morrison won the Murrow Award, the "Media Skeptic of the Year in Honor of Edward R. Murrow's Courage to Challenge Irresponsible Claims," for her thoughtful and sensitive coverage of controversies as a Los Angeles Times columnist and PBS commentator on "Life and Times." This award was presented by Jessica Yu, former Murrow Award winner and recent Oscar winner for Best Short Documentary. Frank Sulloway won the Randi Award, for "The Skeptic of the Year in Honor of James Randi's Commitment to Science and Critical Thinking," for his application of science to history in his magnum opus, BORN TO REBEL. James Randi presented this award. A good time was had by all and the participants seemed to have nothing but positive things to say about the conference and the speakers. Here are just a couple of comments that came in the e-mail today: To the Skeptic Staff! Last year was my first Skeptic conference and the speakers were so brilliant, I had impossibly high expectations of this year's conference. But once again, you and your guests outdid yourselves. The speakers were OUTSTANDING, the information priceless and the program ran smoothly (I know the problems with the PA were just some kind of psychology experiement implemented at Dr. Tavris' request). Anyway, fantastic job, everyone! --Copil Yanez, cyanez@primenet.com Dear Michael and Company, Just a line to say how inspiring Saturday's immersion into the Skeptics Society was for me -- I think I even felt my dendrites growing! All the speakers were marvels, and I especially appreciated the talks given by yourself, Frank Miele, Carol Tavris and Vincent Sarich. Truly heady stuff! Plus, all of it monumentally entertaining. As long as my schedule holds, I plan to attend John Horgan's lecture on the 8th. If you need any volunteer help, I'm a fairly able tabler and receptionist. Feel free to ask. --Best, Holland VanDieren, netherland@earthlink.net Until next time, Michael Shermer