
Since some of the materials which describe the $cientology cult could be
considered to be copywritten materials, I have censored myself and The
Skeptic Tank by deleting any and all possible text files which describes
the cult's hidden mythologies.  I have elected to quote just a bit of the
questionable text according to the "Fair Use" legal findings afforded to
those who report.  -  Fredric L. Rice, The Skeptic Tank, 09/Sep/95

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

From news.interserv.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.primenet.com!cultxpt Wed Jul 19 09:29:34 1995
Path: news.interserv.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.primenet.com!cultxpt
From: cultxpt@primenet.com (Jeff Jacobsen)
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: should critics fear physical harm?
Date: 15 Jul 1995 22:11:33 GMT
Organization: Primenet (602)395-1010
Lines: 48
Message-ID: <3u9eel$209@nnrp4.primenet.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: usr4.primenet.com
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

   I just saw an old Fifth Estate (Canadian TV) program for the first 
time.  Gerald Armstrong, an ex-Scientologist, said he and his friends 
(while he was still in the church) had discussed getting a gun and 
shooting a public critic of the church who had been a high-ranking 
Scientologist.  I saw Margery Wakefield on Florida Public TV state that 
she and some other Scientologists had decided to dump a wayward member 
into the ocean, but when they went to get him he had escaped (she's an 
ex-member).  Steven Fishman (another ex-member) stated that he believes 
there was a murder that involves the church.  And, L. Ron Hubbard wrote 
R2-45, which is a method to go exterior from your body by being shot in 
the head with a .45 pistol.  Hubbard even wrote an order to apply this 
method to certain individuals.
   The Garry Scarff deposition has Scarff stating he was ordered to 
murder Cynthia Kisser, director of the Cult Awareness Network, although 
he never carried it out.  
   These are disturbing me more lately.  As the church begins to 
collapse, there will be more and more pressure on the hierarchy to do 
more and more desperate things to keep the church intact.  I write the 
above not to scare anyone but to put the church on notice that, should 
they revert to physically harming people, there is ample evidence already 
in the public domain which shows prior tendencies toward destructive 
behavior toward the church's perceived enemies.  Such tactics will 
instantly work against the church and would result in its final collapse.
   I know of no cases where the church has actually been proven to 
physcially harm some critic.  I do know that there is a violent side of 
the church.  Overboarding from the ship the Apollo was violent enough to 
have broken someone's arm (this was John McMaster, I think).  There are 
many cases of people stating they were held against their will at times 
while they were under church employment.  Steve Fishman told me that 
while he was being interrogated once in the church that his superior cut 
off a small portion of his skin, held it in front of Steve's face and 
said "now confront your body."  I heard that some of the upper hierarchy 
officers sometimes ran around in a fancy uniform where a dagger was a 
part of the outfit.
   Maybe we should be glad the church prefers to use the court system to 
attack its critics, and private investigators to harass them.  It could 
be much worse.  I hope it doesn't happen.   But, with this violent side, 
the church may be unintentionally encouraging some unstable member to 
commit a violent act against someone they feel is impeding the salvation 
of this planet.  I hope they are taking measures to educate their members 
that violence against critics is illegal, immoral, against church policy 
(even though the Fair Game policy says otherwise), and counterproductive.

 -- ////// Jeff Jacobsen         
SP3, Scientology 
critic PO Box 3541           ftp.primenet.com /users/c/cultxpt
Scottsdale AZ  85271
USA                   http://www.skeptic.com/03.3.jl-jj-scientology.html

