From braintree!news.sprintlink.net!news.us.world.net!ns2.mainstreet.net!news.isp.net!news-out.internetmci.com!internetMCI!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.sesqui.net!uuneo.neosoft.com!usenet Tue Oct 31 10:53:56 1995
Path: braintree!news.sprintlink.net!news.us.world.net!ns2.mainstreet.net!news.isp.net!news-out.internetmci.com!internetMCI!newsfeed.internetmci.com!news.sesqui.net!uuneo.neosoft.com!usenet
From: pes <pes@neosoft.com>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Re: Atom bomb testing is NOT dangerous
Date: 30 Oct 1995 05:33:50 GMT
Organization: NeoSoft Internet Services   +1 713 968 5800
Lines: 81
Message-ID: <471o3u$53k@uuneo.neosoft.com>
References: <110321Z29101995@anon.penet.fi>
NNTP-Posting-Host: scooter-ppp-ee.neosoft.com

an421032@anon.penet.fi (A. McPherson) wrote:
>
> 
> Definition: HASI = Hubbard Association of $cientologists International
> 
> You are probably going to be most angry at your former teachers for giving
> you false information about radiation and its dangers - there are none! It
> has been proven scientifically and with clear logic, that hysterical
> reaction is all that radiation really produces.
> 

   (snip)

      Dear Andrew, 

      I have extensive high level experience in the nations
      nuclear weapons manufacturing facilities, studying these
      liability issues, and have been retained in several cases
      to advise and make recommendations for radio active 
      containment systems on a national scale.

      Your point of confusion has been carefully implanted by
      those with a vested interest in proving radio active
      ***contamination*** harmless, which of course it decidedly
      is not... witness the downwinders from the nevada sites,
      Hiroshima, and Chernobyl.....  these folks are LIABLE
      for massive damage to the human race.

      Accordingly the dissinformation campaign has been to 
      *deliberately* confuse 'radiation' (harmless in the usual
      doses....with  *contamination*  deadly in many cases.


      The physics of the issue stated in a nut shell are that
      when you ingest a PARTICLE.... say PuO for instance, it
      emits alpha radiation directly concentrated on just a few
      cells... this intensive point source alters the cell dna
      structures precipating cancers in maybe one case in 1,000,000.

      One can inhale a million particles of PuO that will assure
      the development of cancer in a contamination situation... these
      same particles however will read very lightly, and if the
      dose is calculated as though it were spread out over the entire
      body... well it would be a harmless dose.


      An analogy:   If one were shot with one ounce of lead bullet
      at 1,000 feet per second... well it would be quite a
      catastrophy... fatal probably.

      If that one ounce of lead were turned to lead powder, and
      shot from the same distance, say 50'...well it would be almost
      totally harmless..... its a concentration of force issue.

      

      Suggested reading:

      An open mind  (openheimer, father of the atomic bomb)
      Brighter than a thousand suns  (Jungk)
       
      Phil      



> All this and more can be found  in ElRon's article of May 6, 1957 "The
> radiation picture and $cientology", culminating in ElRon's admission of
> being a radiator: "I am only saying that we have one case - me - who has
> had 502 ties the 'allowed' amount and is surviving nicely, thank you..."
> 
> I apologize to the Australians. Your hospitality is beyond description.
> 
> Andrew McPherson
> 
> 
> --****ATTENTION****--****ATTENTION****--****ATTENTION****--***ATTENTION***
> Your e-mail reply to this message WILL be *automatically* ANONYMIZED.
> Please, report inappropriate use to                abuse@anon.penet.fi
> For information (incl. non-anon reply) write to    help@anon.penet.fi
> If you have any problems, address them to          admin@anon.penet.fi


